Trump’s ‘bad genes’ comment stokes controversy as election nears

Avatar photo
Vijaya Laxmi Tripura
  • Update Time : Wednesday, October 9, 2024
Trump

Former President Donald Trump has once again stirred controversy with inflammatory remarks about immigrants, further escalating tensions in an already charged US presidential race. On October 7, during a radio interview with conservative host Hugh Hewitt, Trump doubled down on his long-standing anti-immigrant rhetoric, declaring that illegal immigrants were bringing “bad genes” into the United States. This incendiary remark is reminiscent of his December 2023 statement where he accused immigrants of “poisoning the blood” of the country-comments widely criticized as resembling fascist ideology.

In his conversation with Hewitt, Trump argued that immigrants convicted of crimes, particularly homicides, were genetically predisposed to violence. “A murderer-I believe this-it’s in their genes. We’ve got a lot of bad genes in our country right now,” he asserted. The remark quickly drew comparisons to eugenics, the discredited belief that human populations can be improved by controlling who is allowed to reproduce. Critics, including civil rights groups and political opponents, accused Trump of promoting dangerous and dehumanizing ideas.

The White House swiftly condemned Trump’s remarks. Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre labeled them as “vile,” emphasizing that such language has no place in American political discourse. “This comes from the same vile statements that we’ve heard about migrants poisoning the blood. That’s disgusting,” Jean-Pierre said. She further highlighted the administration’s commitment to rejecting hateful speech that could fan the flames of racial division.

The controversy comes as illegal immigration remains a pivotal issue in the 2024 presidential election. Trump’s rhetoric echoes his previous campaign strategies, where he used inflammatory language to galvanize his base while attacking Democrats’ immigration policies, particularly those of his rival, Vice President Kamala Harris.

Trump’s comments were loosely based on Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) data showing that thousands of immigrants, including some convicted of crimes, were not in federal detention. However, the data covered decades, including periods when Trump himself was in office, and failed to distinguish between immigrants in state, local, and other federal facilities. Trump’s misleading interpretation of the data not only stoked fear but also ignored the complexity of the issue, including the legal and procedural nuances of the US immigration system.

This latest wave of fear-mongering follows a familiar pattern in Trump’s campaign. In September, at a rally, he accused illegal immigrants of being “animals” intent on violent crimes such as rape, theft, and murder. “They will walk into your kitchen, they’ll cut your throat,” he claimed, tapping into long-held racial and xenophobic fears. Trump also threatened legal Haitian immigrants in Ohio with deportation, baselessly accusing them of killing and eating local pets.

Such remarks have led to widespread concern about Trump’s embrace of demagoguery, which has the potential to incite violence against marginalized communities, particularly immigrants. Civil rights groups have called his rhetoric dangerous, warning that it can inflame already heightened racial tensions in the country. Trump’s language has repeatedly drawn comparisons to authoritarian leaders of the past, with many pointing to the eerie parallels between his focus on “bad genes” and the racial purity language historically associated with Nazi Germany.

Illegal immigration has emerged as a key issue in the 2024 election, particularly as Trump seeks to draw a sharp contrast between his hardline policies and the Biden administration’s more humanitarian approach. Kamala Harris, who replaced President Joe Biden as the Democratic standard-bearer in July, has faced mounting pressure over immigration policy, a topic that remains one of her campaign’s vulnerabilities.

Border crossings hit record highs at the end of 2023, a point Trump frequently emphasizes to discredit Harris’s leadership on the issue. However, new data shows that migrant apprehensions at the US-Mexico border fell by 75 percent in September, marking the lowest levels since Trump’s presidency. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) credits increased collaboration with Mexico and Central American countries, as well as changes in US immigration policy, for the dramatic decline.

Despite this progress, Trump continues to cast Harris and her administration as inept on immigration, accusing them of allowing criminals to flood into the country. During his rally speeches, Trump has even called for Harris’s prosecution over Biden’s border policies, a move that critics see as an effort to shift attention away from his legal battles and indictments.

It’s notable that Trump, now 78, is the oldest major-party presidential candidate in US history and the first convicted felon to run for office. His legal entanglements, including a series of indictments and convictions related to his business dealings and his role in the January 6 Capitol insurrection, have not deterred his base. If anything, his supporters appear to rally behind him with greater fervor, viewing him as a victim of a politically motivated justice system.

However, Trump’s legal woes cast a long shadow over his campaign. His escalating attacks on immigrants and the Democratic Party appear to be part of a broader strategy to deflect attention from his personal and political vulnerabilities. Polling suggests that he remains neck-and-neck with Harris in both nationwide and swing-state surveys, with illegal immigration expected to be a deciding issue for many voters.

Trump’s use of inflammatory rhetoric, especially on sensitive topics like immigration, is not new. During his presidency, he consistently vilified migrants, from describing Mexicans as “rapists” in his 2016 campaign launch speech to enforcing a family separation policy at the border. These tactics have proven successful in mobilizing his base, but they have also left lasting scars on the nation, deepening divisions and emboldening extremists.

Critics argue that by using phrases like “bad genes” and “poisoning the blood,” Trump is invoking dangerous, racist ideologies that could have real-world consequences, encouraging violence against immigrants and other marginalized groups. As the 2024 election approaches, the stakes of such rhetoric grow ever higher.

In a nation grappling with complex issues like immigration, crime, and economic inequality, Trump’s reductionist and incendiary comments threaten to distract from substantive policy debates. Whether or not his rhetoric will prove to be a winning strategy remains to be seen, but its potential for harm is undeniable.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel

Avatar photo Vijaya Laxmi Tripura, a research-scholar, columnist and analyst is a Special Contributor to Blitz. She lives in Cape Town, South Africa.

Please Share This Post in Your Social Media

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More News Of This Category
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
© All rights reserved © 2005-2024 BLiTZ
Design and Development winsarsoft