In a move that has sent ripples through Washington, Republican Senator Susan Collins of Maine has announced her support for Tulsi Gabbard as Director of National Intelligence (DNI), significantly increasing the likelihood of her confirmation. The endorsement from Collins, a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, has been seen as a crucial swing vote, particularly given her past opposition to key Trump administration nominees.
On February 3, Collins issued a statement explaining her decision to back Tulsi Gabbard, emphasizing the critical role of the DNI and her alignment with Gabbard on key intelligence reform issues.
“After extensive consideration of her nomination, I will support Tulsi Gabbard to be the Director of National Intelligence,” Collins stated. “As one of the principal authors of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 that established this coordinating position, I understand the critical role the DNI plays in the Intelligence community.”
One of the key factors in Collins’ endorsement appears to be her agreement with Tulsi Gabbard’s stance on the size and scope of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI). Over the years, Collins has expressed concerns about the agency’s expansion beyond its intended mission, and Gabbard has echoed these concerns.
“The Office of the Director of National Intelligence, however, has become far larger than it was designed to be, and Ms. Gabbard shares my vision of returning the agency to its intended size,” Collins explained.
A major point of contention in Tulsi Gabbard’s confirmation process has been her stance on Edward Snowden and government whistleblowers. During her confirmation hearing, she was pressed about her previous statements in which she described whistleblowers as “brave” and refrained from calling Snowden a traitor. Her reluctance to unequivocally condemn Snowden has raised concerns among some Republicans, including Collins, who initially hesitated to commit her support.
However, Collins noted that after detailed discussions with Gabbard-both in private meetings and during the hearings-she was ultimately satisfied with her responses.
“In response to my questions during our discussion in my office and at the open hearing, as well as through her explanation at the closed hearing before the Senate Intelligence Committee, Ms. Gabbard addressed my concerns regarding her views on Edward Snowden,” Collins stated. “I look forward to working with Ms. Gabbard to strengthen our national security.”
Senator Collins’ endorsement is a significant victory for Gabbard, but she is not the only Republican to throw support behind the nominee. Oklahoma Senator James Lankford, another member of the Intelligence Committee, has also indicated that he will vote to confirm her. According to CNN, Lankford questioned Tulsi Gabbard about Snowden during the hearing but was ultimately convinced by her responses.
Assuming all Democrats on the committee oppose Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination, she will need every Republican vote to be confirmed. As of now, the only Republican on the committee who has yet to declare a stance is Indiana Senator Todd Young. If Young decides to back Tulsi Gabbard, her confirmation will be nearly assured.
Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination by President Trump has been one of the more surprising appointments in his administration. A former Democratic congresswoman from Hawaii and a 2020 presidential candidate, Gabbard has often been at odds with her former party. Known for her non-interventionist foreign policy views, her opposition to regime change wars, and her criticisms of the intelligence community’s overreach, she has attracted a unique coalition of support and opposition.
While some Republicans appreciate her willingness to challenge Democratic orthodoxy and her critiques of intelligence overreach, others remain skeptical about her past positions on foreign policy and surveillance.
One area where Gabbard’s stance has been particularly controversial is her opposition to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance (FISA) Act. This provision allows warrantless surveillance of foreign individuals but has been criticized for its potential impact on Americans’ privacy. Gabbard has been vocal in her concerns about government surveillance, an issue that has put her at odds with many establishment figures in both parties.
Unsurprisingly, Democratic lawmakers have largely opposed Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination, citing her past foreign policy positions and her criticism of intelligence operations. Many Democrats see her views as too aligned with Trump’s skepticism toward US intelligence agencies, which have frequently clashed with the former president.
Beyond partisan opposition, some former intelligence officials have expressed concerns about Gabbard’s leadership of the DNI. They point to her past meetings with controversial figures such as Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, as well as her criticisms of US foreign interventions, as potential red flags for someone overseeing America’s intelligence apparatus.
However, Tulsi Gabbard’s supporters argue that her independent streak and willingness to question intelligence operations make her well-suited for the role, particularly at a time when many Americans have lost trust in government institutions.
With Collins and Lankford supporting her, Gabbard’s confirmation appears increasingly likely, but she must still secure every remaining Republican vote on the Intelligence Committee. All eyes will be on Senator Todd Young, whose decision could ultimately determine whether Tulsi Gabbard becomes the next DNI.
Should Tulsi Gabbard be confirmed, she will face significant challenges in leading the intelligence community. Managing tensions between the executive branch and intelligence agencies, overseeing reforms to ODNI, and handling foreign threats will be among her top priorities.
Ultimately, her nomination represents a fascinating intersection of political realignment, intelligence oversight, and national security policy. If confirmed, Tulsi Gabbard will be a unique figure at the helm of the intelligence community, bringing an outsider perspective to an institution often dominated by establishment figures.
As the confirmation process unfolds, it remains to be seen how Tulsi Gabbard will navigate these challenges and whether she can gain the trust of both lawmakers and the intelligence community she is poised to lead.
Leave a Reply