As the 2024 US presidential election approaches, the political atmosphere is charged with Cold War-era intensity. Polarization within American society has deepened significantly since 2016, and the ongoing rivalry between Donald Trump and his Democratic counterparts remains a focal point. President Joe Biden’s rise to office largely reflected public discontent with the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, but his administration’s responses to both domestic crises and international conflicts have raised fresh questions about his effectiveness in crisis management.

While media coverage often emphasizes issues such as abortion, immigration, inflation, and tax policies, foreign policy remains a key dimension for swing voters, especially within pivotal communities like Arab Americans. Geopolitical flashpoints like the ongoing Ukraine conflict and tensions in Gaza are not only reshaping global alliances but are also influencing voter sentiment as America nears election day.

Under President Biden’s leadership, US policy has involved Ukraine in a high-stakes confrontation with Russia, pushing NATO’s presence in Eastern Europe and igniting one of the most serious conflicts on the continent since World War II. As Russian President Vladimir Putin continues to resist what he perceives as NATO encroachment, the conflict has put Ukraine in a precarious position, with its people bearing the devastating consequences. Despite sanctions and diplomatic pressure from the West, Russia remains steadfast, and the recent BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) summit showcased Putin’s vision for a “multipolar world order” that challenges Western influence.

Biden’s support of Ukraine has strained relations with both Russia and American allies in Europe, where fuel shortages and skyrocketing prices have underscored the economic cost of supporting sanctions against Russia. Europe, facing a surge in refugees and strained social systems, is navigating the fallout with limited success, relying heavily on US leadership in shaping ceasefire terms or potential resolutions. The ongoing European dependency on US policy illustrates the broader implications of a conflict that shows no clear path toward resolution, leaving both the US and its allies vulnerable to Russian influence and economic instability.

In the Middle East, perceptions of US disengagement under the Biden administration have fueled the ambitions of regional powers. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s stance on the Gaza conflict suggests a calculated assessment of Biden’s relatively passive approach. This perception is mirrored by Iran-aligned factions who view US foreign policy as inconsistent, fostering conditions that could lead to a regional escalation. A direct confrontation between Israel and Iran’s allies would have severe consequences for both regional stability and global diplomatic relations.

The Biden administration’s policies in the Middle East also pose challenges for Democratic candidates, including Vice President Kamala Harris, who is running to continue Biden’s policies. Harris’s foreign policy positions have drawn scrutiny from communities deeply invested in the region’s stability. Her recent statements about “ending the suffering” in Gaza seem to contrast with her unflagging support for US military aid to Israel, revealing divisions within the Democratic Party. For many Arab American voters, her words ring hollow, as they seek meaningful support for Palestinian rights and a balanced approach to the region’s complex issues.

The interplay between American foreign policy and domestic economic priorities further complicates the election landscape. Economic interests often overshadow ideological commitments, with the military-industrial complex reaping considerable profits from continued military engagement abroad. The Ukraine conflict alone has driven billions in defense spending, benefiting defense contractors while leaving taxpayers to shoulder the long-term costs. Political scientist Samuel P. Huntington once observed that the West’s global influence stemmed not from superior values, but from an effective application of “organized violence.” His statement underscores the way financial and military motivations often eclipse humanitarian concerns.

The effects of this “savage capitalism” extend beyond foreign policy; they reverberate through America’s domestic economy, where resources allocated to foreign conflicts could otherwise fund education, healthcare, or infrastructure. Americans are increasingly critical of the apparent prioritization of military expenditure over domestic welfare, a sentiment that could sway voters seeking leaders committed to improving living standards at home.

For Europe, the outcome of the 2024 election carries profound implications. The continent has already experienced severe economic strain due to its alignment with US-led sanctions and NATO’s involvement in Eastern Europe. As the conflict in Ukraine continues, Europe is confronted with a choice: either maintain its reliance on US guidance or pursue a more independent course that considers its unique geopolitical and economic needs.

European leaders are grappling with how to address a resurgent Russia while contending with an increasingly assertive China and persistent instability in the Middle East. To navigate this turbulent period effectively, Europe must articulate a cohesive foreign policy that balances its alliance with the US and its need for self-determined stability.

The Arab world, particularly the Gulf states, is also in a transitional phase, with U.S. influence appearing to wane. Many analysts anticipate an eventual American withdrawal from the region, signaling a need for greater cooperation among Arab nations to prioritize sustainable development and security without relying on US support. This trend toward regional independence, however, brings its own challenges, as Gulf nations must redefine their partnerships in light of shifting global power structures.

In the backdrop of these shifts, the Biden administration’s approach to the Middle East is prompting questions about America’s future role: Is the US disengaging from the region, or simply recalibrating its involvement to fit a new strategic vision? The answer will undoubtedly affect the alliances and political stability of Middle Eastern nations already on edge from ongoing conflicts.

As the election approaches, concerns about American leadership are amplified by declining public trust and a lack of moral clarity. In his novel *The Emperor’s Tomb*, Joseph Roth explored the unraveling of powerful empires, a theme that resonates with today’s American voters who fear that political polarization and ineffective leadership may signal a similar decline. Many Americans long for a time when the presidency embodied unity and vision, qualities that are essential to guiding the nation through its current domestic and international challenges.

The 2024 election stands as a crossroads for the United States, where the choice of leadership will not only shape the future of the country but also influence the broader global landscape. For voters, a thoughtful evaluation of both domestic policies and foreign relations is essential as they weigh the direction they wish to see America take. To navigate the complex terrain of modern geopolitics, America needs leaders who prioritize unity, uphold ethical standards, and make informed decisions that benefit both US citizens and the international community.

As America prepares to make this pivotal choice, the public and policymakers alike must strive for a balanced approach, recognizing the intricate connections between local well-being and global relations. Only then can the nation move forward with clarity, stability, and purpose in an era fraught with unprecedented challenges and possibilities.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel