A high-profile corruption trial in Azerbaijan has ended with the conviction of one of the country’s most prominent former oil executives. On September 8, the Baku Court of Grave Crimes sentenced Ramin Isayev, the former general director of SOCAR AQS, to 14 years in prison on charges of embezzlement, fraud, money laundering, and abuse of office. The court also ordered the confiscation of real estate, cash, and other assets tied to Isayev and his family, underscoring the severity of the case in a country where oil wealth has long been intertwined with corruption scandals.

Isayev, who ran SOCAR AQS between 2008 and 2020, oversaw one of the most important subsidiaries of SOCAR (the State Oil Company of Azerbaijan Republic). SOCAR AQS, a joint venture, was responsible for drilling operations in the Caspian Sea, a core component of Azerbaijan’s energy sector and a major source of the country’s revenue.

During his tenure, Isayev cultivated a reputation as a powerful figure in the oil industry. Yet behind the scenes, investigators alleged that he abused his position to build a vast private fortune at the expense of the state. According to the prosecution, Isayev embezzled at least 54 million manats (about $31.76 million), diverting funds from company projects and state-backed loans into shell firms, luxury real estate, and personal accounts.

Court documents revealed a sophisticated scheme in which Isayev allegedly set up front companies that later secured lucrative state tenders from SOCAR and related enterprises. Investigators said he staffed these firms with close associates and family members, effectively ensuring that state contracts funneled money back into his control.

This nepotism extended into SOCAR AQS itself. Witnesses told the court that Isayev had hired relatives and friends in highly paid positions, despite their lack of relevant qualifications. The inflated salaries, coupled with rigged tender processes, drained millions from the state oil industry.

The scheme went beyond Azerbaijan’s borders. Prosecutors argued that Isayev laundered millions of dollars by investing in real estate in Turkey, where he and his family purchased properties under a new identity. According to RFE/RL’s Azerbaijani service, he obtained Turkish citizenship under the name Ramin Ali Hakan, a move that raised suspicions of an attempt to shield illicit assets abroad.

Isayev’s downfall began in July 2023, when Azerbaijani media reported that he had been arrested in connection with a suspected embezzlement of 16 million manats ($9.41 million). That figure grew significantly as investigators dug deeper into his financial dealings, eventually concluding that more than $30 million had been stolen.

The trial brought new revelations. Authorities accused Isayev not only of theft and laundering but also of organizing cyberattacks against SOCAR AQS, allegedly aimed at disrupting internal records and covering his tracks. They further alleged that he embezzled millions from loans taken out with the International Bank of Azerbaijan, money that was meant to support energy projects but was instead diverted for personal gain.

Throughout the proceedings, Isayev pleaded not guilty, insisting that the wealth attributed to him and his family came from legitimate business activities predating his public sector career. His defense argued that the Turkish real estate investments and assets were the product of private entrepreneurial ventures. The court, however, dismissed these claims as unfounded, siding with prosecutors and delivering one of the harshest sentences for a white-collar crime in Azerbaijan in recent years.

The conviction of Isayev has sent ripples through Azerbaijan’s oil industry, a sector that has historically been plagued by allegations of mismanagement and graft. SOCAR, which has long been accused by international watchdogs of opaque practices, has faced repeated criticism for allowing politically connected insiders to enrich themselves at the expense of the state.

Observers note that while the Isayev case demonstrates the government’s willingness to crack down on corruption, it also highlights systemic weaknesses. Embezzlement on such a massive scale could not have gone undetected without significant lapses in oversight, suggesting that corruption networks remain deeply embedded in the state-run energy industry.

Some analysts argue that the case may reflect broader power struggles within Azerbaijan’s elite. High-profile corruption trials in the past have often been seen as selective justice-punishing certain figures while leaving others untouched. Isayev’s long tenure and sudden downfall raise questions about whether his arrest was triggered by political rivalries or by genuine reformist intentions within the government.

The case also underscores the international scope of corruption in Azerbaijan. By purchasing real estate in Turkey and securing dual nationality, Isayev followed a pattern familiar in corruption scandals worldwide-moving stolen assets abroad to shield them from domestic investigators.

The involvement of the International Bank of Azerbaijan adds another layer, as embezzled funds linked to international financial institutions could spark interest from global regulators. Given Azerbaijan’s role as a key energy supplier to Europe, the scandal has the potential to tarnish its reputation with foreign investors and partners.

For now, the conviction of Ramin Isayev is being portrayed domestically as a victory for accountability. The confiscation of assets and a 14-year prison term signal that, at least in this instance, high-ranking executives are not immune to prosecution.

However, critics remain skeptical. Without broader reforms to strengthen transparency, independent oversight, and rule of law, cases like Isayev’s may remain the exception rather than the norm. For Azerbaijan’s citizens, who continue to struggle with inequality despite the country’s oil wealth, the scandal is a reminder of how corruption has siphoned resources away from the public good.

Whether the government builds on this case to address deeper structural corruption in SOCAR and other state entities remains an open question. For now, the jailing of a once-powerful oil executive serves as both a cautionary tale and a symbol of the entrenched challenges facing Azerbaijan’s energy-rich but politically opaque system.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel