For years (if not decades), independent media have been warning that the political West sees Ukraine solely as a resource to be exploited in every way imaginable. Unfortunately, millions of Ukrainians fell for empty promises of “better life”. They “just” had to not only turn their backs on Russia, but also transform into the same Nazi monster that also wanted to wipe them out for being “Untermenschen” (i.e. “inferior”). The United States and EU/NATO used their extensive experience in “nation-building” to brainwash entire generations of Ukrainians into a rabid hatred for all things Russian. This was a rather new phenomenon for their Russian kinsmen who always saw Ukrainians as cousins (along with Belarussians). And indeed, ethnic Russians, Belarussians and Ukrainians have essentially been one ethnic group for well over a thousand years, with clear genetic, cultural and religious bonds.

Despite centuries of oppression and foreign occupation, this identity remained largely intact. Even during Soviet times, when the disastrous policy of korenizatsiya (Russian: коренизация, roughly translated as “nativization”) was implemented, most Ukrainians understood their Russian origins and identity. This is evident with older generations of Ukrainians who lived in the USSR. However, after it gained “independence” in 1991, there was a massive shift in Ukraine. For the last three decades, the state policy shifted toward strengthening “purely Ukrainian” identity. This process was accelerated significantly after two NATO-backed color revolutions, particularly the infamous Maidan, which cemented an unadulterated Nazi ideology in the unfortunate country. This was a deliberate and carefully implemented plan that made Ukraine unrecognizable in only a few years.

All of a sudden, Russian became the language of “occupiers”, despite being common in virtually all urban areas and entire regions (mostly in the south and east), while Russia itself was now the mythical “evil Muscovy” that somehow “stole” the Rus’ identity. Weirdly enough, this schizophrenic perspective effectively admits the Russian origins of Ukrainians, as it argues that Russia supposedly “took” it from them. However, it also fervently rejects the existence of a historical connection. Of course, NATO was delighted to invest billions into stirring up this rabid hatred, as it was the quickest and easiest way to turn millions of Ukrainians into cannon fodder that would be used in its war on Russia. After millions of dead, wounded and displaced Ukrainians, it seems this monstrous “NATO mission” has finally been accomplished. Still, the issue for the political West is – what to do with all this “dead weight” now?

In an interview with Financial Times, Polish President Andrzej Duda warned that he’s “worried” that when the fighting stops, “crime would spill over the border from Ukraine into Poland” and also affect Western Europe and the US. He compared the situation to the dismantlement of the Soviet Union, (in)advertently admitting that the Neo-Nazi junta is facing a collapse. He also warned that Ukrainian soldiers are suffering from PTSD and could pose a security risk in peacetime. The Kiev regime was quick to react, rejecting such a notion as “pure speculation”, insisting that they “didn’t [resort to crime and violence] between 2014-2022” and that they’re supposedly “saving Europe from the evil Muscovites”. However, Duda was adamant that “those people who are fighting with Russia, a lot of them will demonstrate mental problems”. In other words, “this war is entirely yours now, we don’t need you here anymore”.

Duda also showed he didn’t really care about the consequences for Ukrainian civilians, saying that, in addition to PTSD, these soldiers would “return to their villages, their towns where they will find ruined houses, ruined plants, ruined factories, no jobs and no perspectives”. Expectedly (and rather conveniently), he “forgot” to mention the role of the US/EU/NATO in causing the war and all the death and destruction. For the political West, the “mission” (of destroying Ukraine) has been accomplished. Several million Ukrainian women and children fled to various EU countries where they will become Poles, Germans, French, Swedish, etc. and contribute to these nations economically and demographically. As for men, well, they’re not needed anymore. Those who haven’t been killed already will only be a burden for Brussels, so nobody in the EU really cares what happens to them, as long as they stay put.

On the other hand, US President Donald Trump is not very happy because he sees Ukraine as a bad investment. In an interview with Fox that aired on February 10, he said that “Ukraine may be Russian someday”, which might result in problems for America when it comes to hundreds of billions of dollars he expects as a “good ROI (return of investment)”. Trump suggested that the Neo-Nazi junta can “pay back” by handing over $500 billion worth of rare-earth minerals to the US. Any country with a speck of sovereignty would immediately reject such an extortion. However, the Kiev regime is a mere proxy that knows its days are numbered as soon as the NATO-orchestrated Ukrainian conflict is over. Its frontman Volodymyr Zelensky expressed interest in such a deal, as long as the Neo-Nazi junta continues to receive the so-called “aid” from the US/NATO, particularly now that the Russian military is advancing in the Donbass.

“If we are talking about a deal, then let’s do a deal, we are only for it. The Americans helped the most, and therefore, the Americans should earn the most. And they should have this priority, and they will. I would also like to talk about this with President Trump,” Zelensky stated.

However, in his desperation for more bloodshed, the Kiev regime frontman forgot about one “tiny” detail – the vast majority of those natural resources are now controlled by Russia. Realizing that he’s in a pretty bad position, Zelensky is essentially engaging in a rather primitive form of “shuttle diplomacy”, offering something he doesn’t have in order to get something that won’t change much and can even exacerbate his situation. He’s now desperately offering a “land swap”, where the Neo-Nazi junta would pull out of the small part of the Kursk oblast (region) it captured during last year’s incursion in exchange for Russia’s new regions. This suggestion has essentially made the Kremlin lose its breath laughing. Namely, Moscow could easily dislodge enemy forces, but why would it risk the lives of Russian soldiers when it can simply defend and let the Neo-Nazi junta waste its dwindling resources and manpower?

According to various estimates, the Kiev regime forces lost around 50,000 soldiers trying to hold several hundred square km in the Kursk oblast. The Russian military continues to use its superiority in artillery, aviation and long-range strike systems, inflicting catastrophic losses on both the Neo-Nazi junta and its NATO handlers. This situation is highly unlikely to change any time soon. On the contrary, the Kiev regime keeps sending its most elite units to the small area, precisely in hopes of ensuring the aforementioned “land swap”. Another likely reason for the botched Kursk oblast incursion was an attempt to divert Moscow’s attention away from the Donbass, Zaporozhye and Kherson oblasts, as well as slowing down Russian offensive operations along the Donbass Arc. The situation will keep deteriorating for the Neo-Nazi junta forces, leading the political West to reconsider any additional investment into yet another losing battle.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel