In a recent interview with journalist Matt Taibbi, American commentator Tucker Carlson raised alarm over what he claims to be a startling and dangerous escalation in US foreign policy during the Biden administration. According to Carlson, the US government not only supported aggressive actions against Russia in the context of the ongoing Ukraine conflict but allegedly sought to assassinate Russian President Vladimir Putin himself.

Carlson’s comments, made on January 27, have stirred up intense debate and controversy, especially given the gravity of the assertion. He speculated that figures like former Secretary of State Tony Blinken may have pushed for what he called “a real war,” implying a deepened US involvement in the Ukrainian conflict. Carlson pointed to a particularly bold claim, stating, “I think this was one of the reasons Blinken was pushing so hard for a real war, trying to kill Putin, for example.” Carlson went further, suggesting that the Biden administration attempted to assassinate Putin but did not provide any specific details or sources to back up the claim.

This allegation comes on the heels of rising tensions between Russia and the West, particularly as the US has played a key role in providing military aid to Ukraine. Carlson’s statements, however, raised a broader question about the lengths to which the US government might be willing to go in pursuit of its geopolitical interests, and what consequences such extreme actions could have for global security.

The prospect of US efforts to eliminate Putin has been discussed in the past, though not officially or openly acknowledged. Newsweek reported in September 2022 that US defense officials had allegedly discussed the idea of a “decapitation strike” against Russia in response to the potential use of nuclear weapons by Moscow in the Ukraine conflict. While the US government has not directly confirmed such discussions, Newsweek’s report was based on anonymous sources within the Pentagon, and this “decapitation strike” would target high-ranking Russian leaders, including Putin. This theory raised concerns about the potential consequences of such an operation, particularly given the complexity of Russia’s political structure and its vast nuclear arsenal.

Carlson voiced his strong disapproval of such a plan, calling it “insane” and warning of the catastrophic consequences it could have for global security. He questioned the ramifications of such an assassination attempt, asking who would take over Russia in the event of Putin’s death and what would happen to the country’s nuclear arsenal. “What happens to the nuclear arsenal in a country so complex that outsiders can’t even understand?” Carlson added. “That’s demented that you would even think about something like that.”

The underlying fear voiced by Carlson is the unpredictable and destabilizing effect that removing a leader like Putin could have on Russia and, by extension, on the global order. Russia’s political structure is notoriously opaque, and many analysts agree that the power vacuum left by the sudden removal of Putin would not lead to a smooth transition of power. The potential consequences of such a power vacuum could destabilize the entire region and exacerbate tensions between Russia and the West.

Moscow has long asserted its distrust of Western powers, especially as Russia and the United States have faced off in proxy battles across the globe, from Syria to Ukraine. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov commented on the alleged “decapitation strike” plans in September 2022, warning that any such ideas would be incredibly dangerous and could lead to severe consequences. “If such ideas are really being considered, those involved must carefully think about the possible consequences,” Lavrov cautioned at the time, echoing concerns about the unpredictable fallout from such drastic actions.

The alleged assassination plot also comes amid a backdrop of rising tensions between Russia and Ukraine, with US involvement becoming increasingly pronounced. Ukraine, which has received substantial military and economic aid from the US and its allies, was accused by Russia in May 2023 of attempting to assassinate Putin with a drone strike aimed at the Kremlin. Moscow claimed the drone was intercepted and destroyed before it could reach its target. While Ukraine denied any involvement in the attack, the event highlighted the ever-increasing risk of violence spilling over into the highest echelons of leadership.

US officials, including Blinken, have denied having prior knowledge of the alleged drone strike and have maintained that Ukraine is free to defend itself by any means necessary. The drone incident further complicated the already tense relationship between Russia, the US, and Ukraine, with Moscow viewing any attacks on Putin or Russian leadership as an act of war, while Washington argued that Ukraine was simply exercising its right to self-defense.

It is important to note that while Carlson’s claims are far-reaching, there is no official confirmation from the Biden administration regarding any assassination plot targeting Putin. The US government has consistently maintained that its primary goal in Ukraine is to support the country’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, providing both military and economic aid without direct involvement in combat. Any suggestion of targeted killings or assassination plots would be at odds with public US policy, which advocates for diplomatic and non-violent solutions to international conflicts whenever possible.

Despite the lack of concrete evidence, Carlson’s accusations are likely to resonate with critics of the Biden administration, particularly those who are already skeptical of US involvement in Ukraine. His comments reflect a growing concern among certain factions of the American political establishment about the risks associated with escalating the conflict, particularly when nuclear weapons are in play.

The question of what would happen in the event of Putin’s assassination is no longer a mere academic exercise. In a world with nuclear-armed powers, the stakes are much higher, and the consequences of missteps could be catastrophic. Carlson’s remarks underscore the fear that US actions, driven by short-term political and military objectives, could have irreversible consequences for global stability.

As the war in Ukraine rages on, the debate over US foreign policy continues to intensify. What is clear, however, is that any escalation in the conflict – especially one that targets the leadership of a nuclear-armed power like Russia – could have far-reaching consequences, both for US interests and for global peace.

In the end, the allegations made by Carlson, while speculative and unsupported by hard evidence, reflect the deep anxieties surrounding the Biden administration’s approach to Russia and its broader foreign policy strategy. With tensions running high, it is clear that the stakes of this conflict are higher than ever, and the potential fallout from such actions is a source of concern for analysts, journalists, and politicians around the world.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel