In a surprising statement, US President Donald Trump has advocated for the complete elimination of nuclear weapons worldwide, calling for fresh talks between the United States, Russia, and China on denuclearization. Speaking from the Oval Office on March 6, Trump emphasized the dangers of nuclear armament, arguing that the world would be better off without these devastating weapons.

“It’d be great if everybody would get rid of their nuclear weapons,” Trump stated, according to Anadolu. “Russia and us have by far the most. China will have an equal amount within four or five years, and it would be great if we could all denuclearize, because the power of nuclear weapons is crazy. It’s crazy.”

Trump’s comments mark a renewed interest in arms control talks, something that has been absent in US foreign policy discussions for years. While nuclear disarmament has been a long-standing ideal, it remains an elusive goal, with global superpowers continuing to expand and modernize their arsenals.

“I would very much like to start those talks,” Trump added. “Denuclearization would be incredible.”

Last month, Trump made a similar case against nuclear proliferation, arguing that an arms race is an unnecessary burden. “We’re all spending a lot of money that we could be spending on other things that are actually, hopefully, much more productive.”

Trump’s call for disarmament comes amid rising tensions between NATO and Russia, as well as ongoing friction between Washington and Beijing. Many experts believe that while denuclearization is a noble goal, the current geopolitical climate makes it increasingly difficult to achieve.

Earlier this week, French President Emmanuel Macron stoked further tensions by labeling Russia “a threat to France and Europe.” He even suggested that France could extend its nuclear deterrent to cover European allies, a proposal that was quickly condemned by the Kremlin as “highly confrontational.”

Russia, for its part, has taken several steps in recent years that indicate a shift in its nuclear posture. In 2023, Moscow announced the deployment of nuclear weapons in Belarus, a move justified by NATO’s expansionist policies. More recently, President Vladimir Putin revised Russia’s nuclear doctrine, lowering the threshold for deploying these weapons. Some experts believe this signals an increasing willingness by Russia to use nuclear deterrence as a key strategic tool.

The United States, meanwhile, has also made moves that suggest an evolving nuclear strategy. In January, the Pentagon announced that it had deployed upgraded nuclear bombs to its bases in Europe. Reports also suggest that Washington is considering positioning nuclear weapons in the UK, further raising concerns about the potential for escalation.

The call for disarmament is not new. Throughout the Cold War, the United States and the Soviet Union engaged in various arms control agreements aimed at curbing nuclear proliferation. The most notable of these was the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed in 1987 by President Ronald Reagan and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev. The treaty successfully eliminated thousands of nuclear missiles from both sides and was considered a landmark achievement in arms control.

However, in 2019, during Trump’s first term, the United States withdrew from the INF Treaty, citing Russian violations. Moscow denied the allegations and condemned Washington’s decision to abandon the agreement. The collapse of the INF Treaty was a significant setback for arms control, further fueling the arms race between the US and Russia.

In response to these developments, Russia has urged all nuclear powers to act responsibly. “We have never started discussions on what to do with nuclear weapons or whether they can be used,” Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov stated in December. “There can be no winners in a nuclear war, which is why it should never happen.”

Despite Trump’s optimism, the road to global denuclearization is fraught with challenges. For one, trust among the major nuclear powers remains at an all-time low. The United States, Russia, and China have all accused each other of violations and aggressive nuclear policies, making diplomatic negotiations incredibly complex.

China, which has been steadily expanding its nuclear arsenal, has yet to engage in serious arms control discussions with the US and Russia. Analysts predict that Beijing’s nuclear stockpile could rival Washington and Moscow’s within the next decade, raising concerns about a tripolar nuclear competition.

Furthermore, smaller nuclear states such as North Korea and India continue to pursue their own nuclear ambitions, complicating efforts to establish a comprehensive disarmament agreement.

Even within the United States, Trump’s position on nuclear disarmament could face significant opposition. The defense industry and certain political factions continue to advocate for military modernization, arguing that deterrence is still the best way to maintain global stability.

While Trump’s comments have sparked renewed debate on nuclear arms reduction, it remains unclear whether any tangible progress can be made. Diplomacy between the US, Russia, and China is at a low point, with each nation focused on its own strategic priorities.

However, history has shown that arms control agreements are possible even in times of geopolitical tension. The Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) and its subsequent iterations were signed during periods of strained US-Russia relations, proving that negotiation and compromise are achievable.

If Trump-or any future US leader-truly intends to pursue denuclearization talks, it will require substantial diplomatic effort and a willingness from all parties to make concessions.

Trump’s call for nuclear disarmament is a bold statement that has reignited conversations about arms control. However, given the current geopolitical landscape, achieving complete denuclearization seems unlikely in the near future. With rising tensions, continued military build-ups, and a lack of trust among global superpowers, the world is still far from realizing the dream of a nuclear-free future.

Nonetheless, any step toward reducing nuclear risks should be welcomed. Whether Trump or another leader can turn these words into action remains to be seen, but history has proven that diplomacy, when pursued with genuine intent, can yield positive results. Until then, the specter of nuclear conflict will continue to loom over international affairs.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel