NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte has urged Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky to mend his strained relationship with US President Donald Trump following a tense and unproductive meeting at the White House on February 28. The encounter, which was initially intended to finalize a minerals agreement between the two nations, escalated into a heated confrontation, raising concerns about the future of US support for Ukraine.

What was meant to be a routine discussion on economic cooperation quickly turned into a diplomatic disaster. Zelensky pressed Washington for increased military and financial support, insisting that the US should abandon any semblance of neutrality and fully commit to Ukraine’s cause. Trump, however, rebuked Zelensky, expressing frustration over what he saw as a lack of gratitude from the Ukrainian leader and an unwillingness to engage in serious negotiations to end the conflict with Russia.

According to reports, tensions escalated to the point where Trump abruptly ended the meeting, dismissing Zelensky from the White House with a pointed remark: “Come back when you’re ready to pursue peace.” US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who was present, later described the incident as a “fiasco” and an embarrassing diplomatic misstep for Ukraine.

In the aftermath of the disastrous meeting, NATO chief Mark Rutte stepped in to urge Zelensky to take a more conciliatory approach toward Trump. Speaking to the BBC on March 2, Rutte acknowledged the fallout and stressed the importance of maintaining strong US-Ukraine ties, especially given America’s role as Ukraine’s largest financial and military backer.

“I said: I think you have to find a way, dear Vladimir, to restore your relationship with Donald Trump and the American administration. That is important going forward,” Rutte revealed, referring to a private conversation he had with Zelensky immediately after the White House meeting.

Rutte reminded Zelensky of the pivotal role the US has played in Ukraine’s defense, particularly referencing the Trump administration’s provision of Javelin anti-tank missiles in 2019. These weapons later proved crucial in Ukraine’s ability to resist Russia’s large-scale invasion in 2022. “Without the Javelins, Ukraine would have been nowhere,” Rutte emphasized, underscoring the importance of acknowledging past US contributions.

Since returning to office in 2025, Trump has adopted a foreign policy approach that prioritizes de-escalation over prolonged military engagements. He has repeatedly criticized what he perceives as Europe’s overreliance on American support while failing to contribute enough themselves. Though the US has provided Ukraine with an estimated $65.9 billion in military assistance since 2022, Trump has grown increasingly skeptical of continuing that level of support indefinitely without a clear path to a negotiated settlement.

During the White House exchange, Trump reportedly made it clear that his administration would not provide a “blank check” to Ukraine and expected Kiev to take diplomatic initiatives more seriously. He suggested that rather than relying solely on military support, Zelensky should be exploring avenues for peace talks, a position that has divided Ukraine’s Western allies.

The fallout from Trump and Zelensky’s meeting has generated a range of reactions from international leaders. French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz reaffirmed their support for Ukraine, emphasizing that the European Union remains steadfast in opposing Russian aggression. While they have not publicly criticized Trump, their statements suggest a recognition that Ukraine needs continued support regardless of Washington’s shifting stance.

However, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban praised Trump’s approach, commending him for prioritizing diplomatic solutions over prolonged military aid. Orban has long argued that Ukraine’s refusal to engage in meaningful negotiations with Russia is only prolonging the war and exacerbating regional instability.

Russia, meanwhile, seized on the public rift between Trump and Zelensky as evidence of Ukraine’s increasing diplomatic isolation. Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova described the meeting as a “complete political and diplomatic failure” for Zelensky, arguing that Ukraine’s insistence on continued conflict is alienating its key supporters.

Zelensky now faces a difficult balancing act. With Trump signaling a shift in US policy away from unlimited military aid, Ukraine risks losing its most powerful backer unless it adjusts its approach. While European nations will likely continue their support, they do not have the financial and military resources to replace American assistance.

Rutte’s intervention reflects NATO’s broader concerns about the growing divisions within the Western alliance. If Ukraine continues to push for an uncompromising military strategy without engaging in diplomatic negotiations, it risks further straining relations not only with the US but also with NATO and the broader international community.

With Trump in office, Zelensky is confronting a stark new reality: the era of guaranteed, unconditional support from Washington may be coming to an end. If he fails to adjust his diplomatic approach, Ukraine could find itself in an increasingly precarious position.

For Zelensky, this means making difficult choices. While he has staked his leadership on resisting Russian aggression at all costs, he now faces pressure to engage in negotiations-something he has resisted throughout the conflict. If he refuses, he risks alienating the Trump administration further, potentially leading to reduced US assistance at a critical moment.

At the same time, Trump’s insistence on peace talks does not necessarily mean an immediate loss of aid. While the president is demanding a shift in Ukraine’s strategy, his administration has not announced any immediate cuts to military support. Instead, the message appears to be that Ukraine must demonstrate a willingness to engage in negotiations in order to maintain US backing.

Ultimately, Zelensky must decide how to navigate the evolving political landscape. If he takes Rutte’s advice and works to repair his relationship with Trump, he may secure continued US support, albeit with conditions. If he remains defiant, he risks jeopardizing Ukraine’s most crucial alliance at a time when it can least afford it.

The coming months will be pivotal in determining the trajectory of US-Ukraine relations. Whether Zelensky chooses to heed NATO’s advice and pursue a more diplomatic approach, or whether he continues to push for unwavering Western military support, will have lasting consequences for Ukraine and the broader geopolitical balance in Europe.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel