The recent decision by U.S. President Donald Trump to suspend foreign aid for 90 days, announced on the very night of his second-term inauguration, has sent shockwaves across the globe. For countries like Bangladesh, where U.S. assistance plays a pivotal role in development efforts, this move poses significant concerns. Stakeholders, development partners, and analysts are now grappling with the potential fallout, not just for Bangladesh, but for global stability and progress.

Since Bangladesh’s independence, the United States has been a critical development partner, contributing to sectors like food security, health, governance, education, and environmental sustainability. According to USAID, Bangladesh hosts one of the largest U.S. development programs in Asia, underscoring its strategic importance in South Asia.

In recent years, U.S. aid has played a transformative role in addressing the Rohingya crisis, which has burdened Bangladesh with the care of nearly one million refugees. With over $2.5 billion in humanitarian assistance since 2017, the U.S. has been the largest donor to this cause. This aid has not only supported Rohingya refugees but also benefitted host communities in Cox’s Bazar, a region facing immense socio-economic strain.

Beyond humanitarian assistance, U.S. aid fuels critical development projects. In 2023 alone, Bangladesh received $490 million from the U.S., supporting initiatives across various sectors. This aid is indispensable for a country aiming to transition to upper-middle-income status by 2031.

The executive order directing the suspension of U.S. foreign aid marks a seismic shift in American foreign policy. According to the White House, this reassessment aims to ensure that U.S. foreign aid aligns with national interests, prioritizing safety, strength, and prosperity for Americans.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio encapsulated this approach by asking, “Does it make the U.S. safer? Does it make the U.S. stronger? Does it make the U.S. more prosperous?” The implication is clear: aid programs that fail to directly benefit the U.S. could face cuts or termination.

This marks a departure from the traditional view of foreign aid as a tool for global stability, poverty alleviation, and diplomatic goodwill. Instead, it places U.S. interests above multilateral or humanitarian considerations, signaling a retreat from global leadership.

Bangladesh, like many other aid-dependent nations, stands at a crossroads. The suspension of U.S. aid raises immediate concerns about the fate of ongoing projects and the future of critical programs. For instance, how will the Rohingya crisis be managed without sustained U.S. support? Who will fill the vacuum if U.S. funding is curtailed?

Furthermore, the U.S. decision to withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO) adds another layer of uncertainty. The WHO has been a vital partner in combating health challenges in Bangladesh, including the COVID-19 pandemic. Reduced funding for the organization could weaken its capacity to support developing countries, leaving Bangladesh vulnerable to public health crises.

The broader implications are equally troubling. U.S. aid has been instrumental in fostering democracy, promoting gender equality, and enhancing climate resilience in Bangladesh. Any disruption to these programs could derail progress and undermine the country’s development trajectory.

The suspension of U.S. aid is not just a Bangladesh issue; it’s a global one. For decades, the United States has been the largest provider of foreign aid, using its resources to address global challenges, from poverty to pandemics. This leadership role has helped maintain a semblance of balance in an increasingly fragmented world.

However, the shift in U.S. policy threatens to upend this dynamic. Countries in Africa, Asia, and Latin America that rely heavily on U.S. assistance could face severe setbacks. The potential weakening of multilateral institutions like the WHO could exacerbate global inequalities, leaving vulnerable populations without access to essential services.

Moreover, the U.S. decision could embolden other nations to adopt a similarly insular approach, undermining international cooperation. In an era where global challenges—climate change, pandemics, and migration—require collective action, the withdrawal of U.S. leadership could have dire consequences.

President Trump’s executive order is rooted in the argument that U.S. aid programs must align with American interests. While this is a legitimate consideration, it’s worth questioning whether such a narrow definition of “interest” serves the U.S. or the world in the long run.

Foreign aid is not merely an act of altruism; it’s a strategic investment. By addressing poverty, instability, and crises abroad, the U.S. reduces the risk of conflicts, migration, and security threats that could spill over into its borders. In regions like South Asia, where geopolitical tensions run high, U.S. aid plays a stabilizing role, fostering goodwill and strengthening alliances.

For Bangladesh, the U.S. has been more than just a donor—it has been a partner in progress. This partnership is built on shared interests, from economic growth to regional stability. It would be shortsighted to undermine these gains in the name of immediate national benefits.

In the face of uncertainty, Bangladesh must adopt a proactive approach. First, it should engage in diplomatic efforts to emphasize the mutual benefits of continued U.S. aid. Highlighting Bangladesh’s strategic importance as a partner in South Asia could help secure support for critical programs.

Second, Bangladesh should diversify its sources of aid and investment. While the U.S. remains a key partner, relying solely on one donor is risky. Strengthening ties with other nations and multilateral organizations can provide a buffer against potential aid cuts.

Finally, Bangladesh must accelerate efforts to achieve self-reliance. By fostering economic growth, improving governance, and investing in human capital, the country can reduce its dependence on foreign aid and chart its own course toward prosperity.

The suspension of U.S. aid is a wake-up call for Bangladesh and the world. It underscores the need to rethink development strategies, prioritize self-reliance, and foster international cooperation.

At the same time, the U.S. must recognize that its global leadership role comes with responsibilities. By prioritizing short-term gains over long-term stability, it risks losing the trust and goodwill of its partners. In an interconnected world, true strength lies not in isolation, but in collaboration.

For Bangladesh, the path ahead is fraught with challenges. But with resilience, innovation, and strategic diplomacy, it can navigate this uncertain terrain and continue its journey toward a brighter future.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel