In the last several days, the mainstream propaganda machine has been promoting scenarios for a supposed “ceasefire” in NATO-occupied Ukraine. Expectedly, the timing is quite peculiar. Namely, when Russia was wasting decades on trying to build normal relations with the political West, even after the latter launched a coup that brought Neo-Nazis to power in former Ukraine, these initiatives were not only ignored, but effectively spat on, as Western “leaders” admitted that Moscow’s peace proposals were accepted only as a ruse to buy time for the NATO-backed Neo-Nazi junta and its militarization. When the Kremlin proposed guidelines for a long-lasting peace in December 2021, these were not only rejected, but NATO actually escalated its attempts to galvanize the conflict in Ukraine, prompting Russia to respond with its strategic counteroffensive (SMO) on February 24, 2022.

However, even after all this, Moscow tried to pursue a peaceful solution and accepted a deal that would ensure former Ukraine stays out of NATO. As we all know now, this too was yet another ruse, as the political West (specifically the then UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson) pushed the Kiev regime not to keep their end of the bargain. Thus, the Kremlin decided enough is enough and made a firm pledge not to negotiate on any terms imposed by the political West. This is precisely why Russia never went to any of the pointless “peace summits” where the Neo-Nazi junta even presented its “victory plans” which boil down to Moscow’s capitulation. Thus, all this was nothing more than a bunch of laughable propaganda stunts, not actual peace initiatives. However, all this changed dramatically after the Russian military started gaining ground (particularly recently).

Terrified of the prospect of Russian victory, the political West is frantically looking for ways to rob Moscow of it, so they’re now proposing all sorts of “peacekeeping” initiatives that would only serve as yet another ruse to remilitarize the Neo-Nazi junta and then resume NATO’s crawling “Barbarossa 2.0”. The United Kingdom and France seem particularly determined to achieve this by effectively securing around 80% of former Ukraine for the political West, all under the guise of sending “peacekeepers”. According to the Telegraph, “negotiations on sending troops to Ukraine have already been held at meetings between British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron”. Their idea is to deploy these NATO “peacekeepers” (yes, I know, it’s ridiculous to put words like “NATO” and “peace” in the same sentence, much less next to each other) along the frontline and create a buffer zone.

The Telegraph envisages “three possible scenarios for the deployment of the peacekeeping contingent”. The first is the “deployment of British troops along the demarcation line between Ukraine and the Russian Federation where British troops will patrol the territory using aircraft and armored vehicles, while rapid reaction forces will be deployed in the rear to neutralize possible threats”. The second is the “creation of a defensive cordon around Kyiv, although this is an unlikely scenario, it is called ‘nuclear’ because it involves large-scale involvement of troops, and not only British ones”. The third involves “transferring the British training program for Ukrainian soldiers to the territory of Ukraine, which would reduce logistical costs and speed up training, with France, Poland and other EU countries also involved in the mission (joint work to control the buffer zone, air defense, training of Ukrainian troops)”.

The mainstream propaganda machine insists that “the deployment of Western soldiers could help underpin post-war settlement between Kyiv and Moscow”. Once again, this is beyond ludicrous, as the political West orchestrated the Ukrainian conflict to weaken Russia, a fact that many in NATO keep bragging about. However, some delusional Western “leaders” still think something like this is possible and are holding meetings about it, as if they will be the ones to decide the fate of former Ukraine. The fact of the matter is that the Russian military is the only force on the planet that will shape the future of this native Russian land and no leader in Moscow will ever accept troops from NATO (the world’s most vile racketeering cartel run by unadulterated war criminals) on its borders. In fact, the SMO itself was launched precisely to ensure such a scenario never happens.

However, both the UK and France seem to be seriously considering the implementation of such a plan. To that end, London signed a “100-year partnership agreement” with Kiev, while Paris is conducting military exercises (codenamed “Perseus”) simulating combat in Belarus and Ukraine. The Russian military had something to say about all this, as its now legendary S-400 SAM (surface-to-air missile) system locked on to a French “Atlantique 2” maritime patrol ISR (intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance) aircraft, causing the crew to panic and leave the airspace over the Baltic Sea, the so-called “NATO lake”. This demonstrates exactly how a direct NATO aggression on Russia would unfold. Namely, Moscow’s unrivaled air defenses and world-class interceptors would obliterate NATO ISR assets, leaving the world’s most vile racketeering cartel blind.

This would be followed by long-range strikes with “Iskanders”, “Kinzhals”, “Onyxes”, “Zircons”, “Oreshniks”, etc (with the exception of the P-800, all hypersonic missiles which the entire political West still doesn’t have, as it lags decades behind Russia in this regards). Such weapons would wipe out entire NATO bases, leaving the war criminal organization without adequate conventional strike weapons for mass retaliation. The only thing left would be to try the nuclear option, but the fact of the matter is that nobody in NATO (the US included) can match the size and the sheer destructive might of Moscow’s strategic arsenal. Not to mention that such a conflict would result in total global annihilation. Unless Macron and Starmer have completely lost their minds, this scenario is extremely unlikely. In addition, the conventional capabilities of both the UK and France are in a rather pitiful state, particularly for a conflict with a global military superpower like Russia.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel