In a spectacle that has transformed fast food into a political battleground, former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris are both vying for what some are calling the “McDonald’s vote.” In the past, candidates might have boasted about their military or public service, but this year, they’re fighting over who better represents the values of a brand synonymous with both American success and decline. Their public sparring underscores a profound question facing voters: is McDonald’s, once the cheerful symbol of upward mobility and affordable indulgence, still emblematic of the American Dream, or is it a reminder of its erosion?

Recently, Trump appeared at a McDonald’s in Feasterville, Pennsylvania, donning an apron and working the drive-thru window. The former president quipped that his brief stint outpaced Harris’s own alleged tenure at the fast-food chain. His theatrics were designed to appeal to everyday Americans, casting himself as relatable, hardworking, and grounded. Yet, the reaction was divisive. Online critics flooded Yelp with snarky reviews, accusing Trump of failing to meet the health code, letting his bronzer spill onto fries, and acting with disregard for public health guidelines. The backlash prompted Yelp to disable new reviews, but Trump’s visit still struck a chord, resonating with a segment of Americans who feel McDonald’s is more than a fast-food joint-it’s a cultural institution.

Harris first introduced McDonald’s into the political spotlight earlier this year, tweeting about her days “working the fries” and her support for fair wages and safe working environments. Her message connected her personal experience with her support for the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), which represents fast-food workers pushing for a $15 minimum wage. By aligning with the workforce rather than the corporate image, Harris cast herself as an advocate for economic reform in an industry that many now rely on for more than just a first job. It was a strategic move, aiming to solidify support among working-class voters while emphasizing the economic struggles at the heart of her campaign.

Caught in the middle, McDonald’s has remained steadfastly apolitical, much like Switzerland in a geopolitical conflict. A company spokesperson stated, “We are not red or blue-we are golden,” emphasizing the brand’s stance on neutrality. Yet, McDonald’s as an institution inevitably reflects America’s contradictions. Once the beacon of affordable, easy indulgence, McDonald’s now stands as a symbol of both inflation and nostalgia, embodying memories of simpler times while grappling with the economic and social complexities of today’s America.

For millions of Americans, particularly Generation X and older, McDonald’s occupies a place of sentimental value. It’s an indelible part of life milestones-whether celebrating birthdays in a McDonald’s PlayPlace, grabbing hotcakes after all-night graduation parties, or picnicking in the park with a Big Mac. However, these nostalgic memories are now overshadowed by escalating prices, a sleeker but less inviting aesthetic, and a shift away from its status as the go-to place for cheap meals.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., now an ally of Trump’s, recently took to social media to bemoan McDonald’s switch from beef tallow to vegetable oils in its fries, linking it to rising obesity rates. His post struck a chord with people who recall the “golden days” when the company seemed more authentically American, operating with familiar simplicity rather than catering to global palates. For Trump’s supporters, this nostalgia for an era when McDonald’s fries “tasted better” resonates as a microcosm of their longing for an America they feel has been lost.

Harris’s appeal to workers, emphasizing the struggle for livable wages, underscores a stark economic reality: in today’s economy, jobs that were once seen as stepping stones, like those at McDonald’s, have now become lifelines for many American families. Where fast-food employment was once a rite of passage for high school students, it has morphed into a career path with a growing need for benefits, parental leave, and tuition assistance. This evolution represents the larger economic forces driving inequality and dwindling opportunities for upward mobility in the US.

With inflation driving menu prices up 40 percent since 2019, McDonald’s reflects the financial strain felt across the nation. As Trump and Harris battle for the “McDonald’s vote,” they are, in many ways, arguing over two interpretations of the American experience: Harris envisions a “shining city upon a hill” where economic justice prevails, while Trump depicts a country in decline, with McDonald’s symbolic of what he calls “a garbage can.”

McDonald’s efforts to engage with social issues have also drawn fire from multiple fronts. In recent years, the company ran ads supporting the Black Lives Matter movement and changed its logo to celebrate International Women’s Day. However, these moves backfired when advocates criticized them as shallow “woke-washing” rather than genuine support for underpaid “black and brown” employees. This friction exposes the limits of corporate activism and highlights the perception that McDonald’s, like many institutions, is struggling to adapt to a rapidly changing society.

At its core, the “McDonald’s vote” is about more than just fast food-it represents a divided vision of America. Harris’s message emphasizes solidarity and improvement within the current system. She champions progressive labor reforms and believes America is still a model for the world. Trump’s message, by contrast, is one of frustration and nostalgia. He positions himself as the candidate who is not afraid to call out the “broken ice cream machine,” a metaphor for a broken system that he claims Harris and her establishment allies refuse to fix.

Polls indicate that many Americans share Trump’s sentiment, with 65 percent believing the country is headed in the wrong direction. For Trump, McDonald’s isn’t just a nostalgic stop on the campaign trail; it’s a symbol of how America once led the world and how he plans to restore it to that status. Harris, on the other hand, sees her connection to McDonald’s as a bridge to the workers who need protection and a fair wage in an economy that has left them behind.

The fight for the “McDonald’s vote” may seem frivolous, but it’s anything but trivial. It encapsulates a broader struggle over the future of America-between those who feel nostalgia for a perceived “greater” past and those who are pushing for a future where economic and social equity are paramount. Each side offers a different solution to the issues McDonald’s has come to represent: Trump promises a return to an idealized version of America’s past, while Harris looks toward a reformed vision that addresses the modern workforce’s needs.

Ultimately, the “McDonald’s vote” speaks to the core of what it means to be American today. It reflects a tug-of-war between the golden years of a simpler, more affordable past and the complicated realities of the present. Whether voters will choose nostalgia or progress remains to be seen, but the Golden Arches are undeniably casting a long shadow over the 2024 election.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel