As the 2024 US election approaches, revelations have surfaced about a foreign involvement that raises both eyebrows and concerns. Sofia Patel, head of operations for the United Kingdom’s Labour Party, made an intriguing claim in a now-deleted LinkedIn post: she’s mobilizing nearly 100 current and former Labour Party staff to head to critical US battleground states.

According to Patel, these foreign volunteers will play a role in Democratic campaigning efforts in states like North Carolina, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Virginia. The involvement of the UK’s Labour Party in US elections is causing a stir, particularly as the Democratic Party positions itself as the primary defender against foreign interference.

The prospect of British Labour Party staffers engaging in the US election might not violate specific legal provisions, but it certainly complicates the Democrats’ stance on foreign involvement in elections. While election law expert Hans von Spakovsky acknowledges that foreign nationals can volunteer in US campaigns as long as they’re unpaid, this development adds an uncomfortable twist to the narrative.

According to von Spakovsky, Democrats have long criticized Republicans, particularly Donald Trump, for alleged foreign interference in US elections. He notes that the Labour Party’s involvement undermines their messaging. “From the standpoint of public relations, the Democrat Party has been the loudest complainer about ‘foreign interference’ in elections,” von Spakovsky remarked. “Yet, here they are accepting volunteers from a foreign political party?”

The Federal Election Commission (FEC) has established clear guidelines prohibiting foreign nationals from making contributions, including expenditures of personal funds, to influence federal, state, or local elections. However, the law makes an allowance for foreigners to volunteer in campaign activities if they are unpaid. The question arises: if these Labour staffers are being compensated for travel or housing by their own party back in the UK, does that violate US election laws?

Von Spakovsky points to a precedent set in 2016 when the Australian Labor Party was found to have violated US election law by compensating volunteers working for Bernie Sanders’ campaign. While the volunteers were unpaid for their US campaign efforts, their stipends and travel expenses were covered by the Australian party. The FEC ruled that this constituted an illegal foreign contribution, resulting in fines for both the Australian party and Sanders’ campaign.

“If the UK Labour Party is paying for their staff’s travel or housing while they work in the US election, this could also be considered a violation of US campaign finance laws,” von Spakovsky explained. The case raises concerns that similar financial arrangements might be made for Patel’s volunteers.

Hillary Clinton’s involvement in the recruitment effort is another contentious factor. According to Patel’s post, interested volunteers were instructed to contact “[email protected],” suggesting that these foreign volunteers would be working on behalf of Vice President Kamala Harris’s campaign. This connection to Clinton is notable, as her 2016 campaign was heavily involved in the infamous Steele dossier-a piece of British political interference that falsely implicated Trump in colluding with Russia during the 2016 election.

Rep. Tom Tiffany, a Republican from Wisconsin, emphasized the irony of Democrats being tied to foreign political influence, given their previous outcry over such interference. “If Democratic organizations are paying them, they need to comply with the campaign finance laws of the United States of America,” Tiffany remarked, underscoring the potential for foreign influence if Labour volunteers are being financially supported by their party.

Tiffany also highlighted the broader implications of foreign involvement in US elections, particularly from British political operatives. He pointed to the Steele dossier as a glaring example of British interference being used to undermine a US candidate, despite ultimately being debunked. “The Clinton campaign was able to use that phony dossier to tarnish Trump all the way to the 2018 midterms,” Tiffany said, noting the complicity of media outlets in spreading the false narrative.

The timing of Patel’s recruitment efforts-less than two weeks before the election-raises further questions about the motivations behind this move. Rep. Tiffany views the Labour Party’s involvement in the Harris campaign as a sign of desperation. “Pulling out the UK Labour Party for help at this point, with a little over two weeks to go before the election, is very much an act of desperation,” Tiffany remarked.

Vice President Kamala Harris has faced significant challenges throughout her campaign, with critics pointing to her perceived lack of authenticity and opportunism. As Harris attempts to galvanize voter support, particularly in key battleground states, the injection of foreign volunteers may be seen as an effort to shore up struggling ground operations. However, this move could backfire, as it may reinforce negative perceptions of her campaign and raise legitimate concerns about the Democratic Party’s reliance on foreign political operatives.

Labour Party involvement in US elections, whether legally permissible or not, plays into broader concerns about foreign influence in American politics. The US has long prided itself on safeguarding its electoral process, but in recent years, allegations of foreign interference have become a focal point of political discourse.

The involvement of left-leaning foreign billionaires like Hansjörg Wyss in American elections further complicates the issue. Wyss, a Swiss billionaire, has been accused of funneling millions of dollars into US political organizations that support Democratic candidates. Although foreign nationals are prohibited from donating to US campaigns, Wyss’s donations to advocacy groups have sparked concerns about backdoor foreign influence.

As more questions arise about the role of foreign actors in US elections, both parties face increased scrutiny. For Democrats, who have positioned themselves as defenders of democracy and opponents of foreign interference, the involvement of UK Labour Party staffers in US battleground states may come across as hypocritical.

Sofia Patel’s recruitment of Labour Party staff to volunteer in critical US battleground states adds a controversial element to an already contentious election. While their involvement may be technically legal if uncompensated, the optics of foreign political operatives influencing a US election raises ethical and legal questions. As Democrats continue to champion the fight against foreign interference, the Labour Party’s assistance may inadvertently undermine their message and open them up to accusations of hypocrisy. Whether this move is an act of desperation or a strategic calculation remains to be seen, but it is sure to fuel further debate about the integrity of US elections.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel