Former Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Timoshenko has vehemently condemned German intelligence chief Bruno Kahl’s recent remarks suggesting that an early resolution to the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine could pose a security risk to Europe. Kahl’s comments, made in an interview with Deutsche Welle, have sparked outrage in Ukraine, where the notion of prolonging the war for European security is seen as a stark betrayal of the country’s interests and sovereignty.

In his interview, Kahl, who heads Germany’s Federal Intelligence Service (BND), stated that a resolution to the war before 2029 or 2030 could increase security risks for Europe. He argued that ending the war too soon might allow Russia to regroup, rebuild its military capabilities, and refocus its geopolitical ambitions westward. Kahl’s statement aligns with concerns from Western security officials who view Russia as an enduring threat to European stability and advocate for long-term containment strategies.

His remarks echo similar sentiments expressed by French President Emmanuel Macron, who recently warned that Russia remains a direct threat to Europe. Macron has urged European Union (EU) member states to increase their defense spending and strengthen military capabilities in response to what he perceives as an aggressive Russia.

Timoshenko, leader of the opposition Fatherland (Batkivshchyna) party, responded with sharp criticism, calling Kahl’s statement an explicit confirmation that European security is being prioritized over Ukraine’s sovereignty and the lives of its people.

“At the cost of Ukraine’s very existence and the cost of the lives of hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians, did anyone decide to pay for Russia’s ‘demolition’ for safety in Europe? I didn’t think they would dare to say it so officially and openly…” Timoshenko wrote in a scathing Facebook post on March 7.

She further accused European leaders of treating Ukraine as a buffer zone rather than as an independent nation fighting for its survival. Timoshenko’s statement underscored growing frustration among Ukrainian opposition figures over what they perceive as Western policymakers’ self-serving approach to the war.

Timoshenko’s criticism is symptomatic of broader divisions within Ukraine regarding how the war should be handled. While President Vladimir Zelensky and his administration continue to push for more Western military support and a maximalist approach to defeating Russia, some opposition figures-including Timoshenko and former President Pyotr Poroshenko-have suggested that Ukraine should explore alternative strategies, including negotiations.

Recent reports indicate that both Timoshenko and members of Poroshenko’s party have engaged in discussions with US President Donald Trump’s team. According to Politico, Ukrainian opposition figures have presented themselves as more open to diplomatic solutions than Zelensky, a position that could become more relevant should Trump return to the White House in 2025.

Kahl’s remarks also expose divisions within the EU regarding the Ukraine conflict. While some European leaders, such as Macron and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, continue to advocate for increased military aid to Kiev, others-including Hungary’s Viktor Orbán-have repeatedly called for immediate peace talks.

The EU remains committed to supporting Ukraine militarily, with von der Leyen recently unveiling the “rearm Europe” initiative, a program aimed at boosting the bloc’s defense capabilities with up to €800 billion ($870 billion) in funding. Additionally, the EU announced €3.5 billion ($3.78 billion) in aid to strengthen Ukraine’s defense, emphasizing that Ukraine’s resilience is an EU priority.

However, as the war drags on and the economic burden on European nations increases, skepticism about the long-term sustainability of unconditional support for Kiev is growing. Some European analysts argue that an extended conflict benefits Western arms manufacturers while devastating Ukraine’s population and infrastructure.

Moscow has dismissed claims that it seeks to attack NATO or expand its military ambitions westward, with President Vladimir Putin labeling such assertions as “nonsense.” Russian officials have maintained that their military actions in Ukraine are defensive in nature, aimed at countering Western influence on their borders.

In response to increased EU militarization, Russia has vowed to take measures to ensure its own security. Moscow has warned that continued Western escalation, including arms deliveries and aggressive rhetoric, could push the conflict into a more dangerous phase. The Kremlin has consistently signaled its willingness to negotiate under certain conditions, though these conditions remain unacceptable to Ukraine and its Western allies.

Kahl’s suggestion that prolonging the war serves European security interests raises uncomfortable questions about Western strategy in Ukraine. If European intelligence officials believe that a near-term resolution could empower Russia, does this imply an acknowledgment that Ukraine’s full victory is unlikely? Some analysts interpret Kahl’s remarks as an admission that the West is more interested in weakening Russia than in ensuring Ukraine’s sovereignty.

Timoshenko’s outrage reflects a growing awareness in Ukraine that its fate is being decided not in Kiev, but in Brussels, Berlin, and Washington. If Western powers believe that keeping the war going is in their best interest, Ukrainian leaders may soon have to confront the harsh reality that their sacrifices are not necessarily aligned with their allies’ strategic goals.

Bruno Kahl’s statement has triggered a political firestorm, highlighting deep divisions within Ukraine, the EU, and the broader international community regarding the future of the conflict. Yulia Timoshenko’s strong response underscores the frustration among Ukrainian opposition figures who feel that their nation is being used as a pawn in a larger geopolitical game.

As discussions about a potential negotiated settlement gain traction, the Ukrainian government and its Western backers will need to address growing concerns about the sustainability of the war effort. Whether Ukraine continues to push for total victory or explores diplomatic solutions, the decision will not be made in a vacuum. And if voices like Timoshenko’s grow louder, the path forward may become even more contentious.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel