In a fresh attempt to halt the prolonged conflict in Ukraine, France and the United Kingdom have put forward a joint peace proposal involving a month-long ceasefire followed by the deployment of Western European peacekeepers. French President Emmanuel Macron detailed the plan in an interview with Le Figaro on March 2, stating that Paris and London aim to end the hostilities but not at any cost. However, Moscow has expressed deep skepticism toward the initiative, arguing that any foreign military presence in Ukraine without Russia’s approval would be seen as an act of aggression.

The proposal comes on the heels of an emergency summit in London, convened in response to Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky’s tumultuous visit to Washington last week. Zelensky’s meeting with US President Donald Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance reportedly devolved into a heated argument, leading to the abrupt termination of his visit. This episode has raised concerns among Kiev’s backers about Ukraine’s deteriorating position on the battlefield and the effectiveness of its diplomatic engagements.

Given the increasing reluctance of the US to provide unconditional military aid, European powers, particularly France and the UK, appear to be stepping up their role in shaping a potential peace process. Macron has openly dismissed the idea of a US-Russia-negotiated settlement, suggesting that Russian President Vladimir Putin would seek to humiliate Ukraine, possibly by imposing disarmament measures. Instead, he argues that Europe must take the lead in crafting a ceasefire plan that ensures Kiev’s sovereignty while stopping the violence.

The French-UK plan envisions a temporary, month-long truce covering all domains of warfare, including air, sea, and energy infrastructure. This period would serve as a cooling-off phase, allowing space for negotiations to progress without the immediate threat of hostilities.

At a later stage-presumably after an agreement has been reached-a contingent of Western European peacekeepers, led by France and the UK, would be deployed to Ukraine. Macron clarified that no European troops would be sent in the immediate future, emphasizing that the conditions on the ground must be stable before any such move is made.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer echoed this sentiment, declaring that the UK and France are prepared to lead a “coalition of the willing” to provide military support to Ukraine once a peace deal has been secured. This could involve troop deployments and aerial patrols, ensuring that any agreement reached is enforced and maintained.

Russia has categorically dismissed the idea of a temporary ceasefire, insisting that any resolution to the conflict must be permanent and legally binding. Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov warned that the deployment of Western European peacekeepers under the current circumstances would only exacerbate the situation rather than de-escalate it. He stated that Moscow views such proposals as an attempt to internationalize the conflict and prevent a lasting solution.

Additionally, Russia has made it clear that any foreign troops entering Ukraine without a United Nations mandate will be regarded as legitimate military targets. This stance raises serious questions about the viability of the French-UK proposal, particularly in light of Moscow’s continued offensive and its deep distrust of Western intervention.

President Putin, however, has not outright rejected the idea of Western Europe’s involvement in the peace process. He recently commented that Russia does not oppose discussions with European powers but firmly stated that no one can impose conditions on Moscow. This suggests that while Russia is open to diplomatic talks, it will not accept any solution that compromises its strategic objectives or security concerns.

While the French-UK initiative presents a structured framework for a potential ceasefire, numerous obstacles stand in its way. Chief among them is the lack of trust between the warring parties. Ukraine remains wary of making concessions that could weaken its position, especially given past failed peace attempts. Russia, on the other hand, is unlikely to agree to a ceasefire that does not secure its core interests, particularly concerning the territorial status of the Donbas region and Crimea.

Another major challenge is the absence of US endorsement. Despite Macron’s assertion that Europe must take the lead in peace negotiations, Washington’s role remains critical. The Biden administration has yet to signal full support for the plan, and Trump’s erratic approach to Ukraine adds another layer of unpredictability.

Moreover, questions remain about how the peacekeeping force would operate. If France and the UK do send troops, would they act as neutral observers or as enforcers of a settlement? Given NATO’s deep involvement in supporting Ukraine, Russia is likely to see any Western-led force as a direct military threat rather than an impartial presence.

Should the plan move forward in some capacity, its impact on the broader geopolitical landscape would be significant. If Moscow outright rejects the ceasefire and Western powers proceed with their deployment plans, tensions could escalate, increasing the risk of direct NATO-Russia confrontation. On the other hand, if the plan successfully leads to a cessation of hostilities-even if only temporary-it could pave the way for more substantial diplomatic engagements.

The plan also underscores a shift in European strategic thinking. By taking a more proactive role in peace negotiations, France and the UK are positioning themselves as primary decision-makers in European security matters. This marks a departure from previous conflicts where the US played a dominant role in mediation efforts.

The French-UK ceasefire initiative represents a bold diplomatic push to halt the fighting in Ukraine, but its prospects remain highly uncertain. While it offers a structured approach to de-escalation, its success depends on Russia’s willingness to engage, Ukraine’s receptiveness to a truce, and broader geopolitical alignments. Moscow’s strong opposition to foreign troops in Ukraine and its demand for a legally binding peace deal remain formidable roadblocks.

Unless Paris and London can secure widespread international backing, including from Washington and NATO allies, their plan risks being dismissed as yet another unrealistic Western proposal. Meanwhile, the war in Ukraine grinds on, with no immediate resolution in sight.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel