US President Donald Trump has suggested that he is open to visiting Russia, contingent on progress in peace negotiations to end the ongoing Ukraine conflict. During a joint press conference with French President Emmanuel Macron in Washington on February 24, Trump was asked about the possibility of a visit to Moscow. He responded, “If all this gets settled down, which I think it will, sure, I would go there, and he’d come here too,” seemingly referring to Russian President Vladimir Putin potentially visiting the US.

This statement has sparked discussions on the potential for a significant diplomatic thaw between Washington and Moscow, particularly as it comes amid Trump’s direct efforts to mediate an end to the Ukraine conflict. While the details of such a visit remain uncertain, the very suggestion signals an attempt by the Trump administration to reshape relations with Russia, potentially altering the trajectory of US foreign policy.

Trump’s comments hint at a conditional approach, with a visit to Russia dependent on the resolution of the Ukraine crisis. This stance aligns with his broader foreign policy philosophy of direct engagement, often favoring diplomacy over prolonged hostilities. The notion of a presidential visit to Moscow is notable given the deeply strained relations between the two countries in recent years, particularly due to the Ukraine war and extensive sanctions imposed on Russia by the US and its allies.

Reports of a possible visit gained traction after French conservative news magazine Le Point claimed on February 21 that “the scenario of Trump’s presence in Moscow alongside Putin on May 9 is being seriously considered in Europe.” However, both Washington and Moscow have since denied having such plans, suggesting that while a visit remains a possibility, it is unlikely to happen in the immediate future.

Victory Day, celebrated annually on May 9, commemorates the Soviet Union’s victory over Nazi Germany in World War II. The event is marked by a large military parade on Moscow’s Red Square, symbolizing national pride and military strength. Foreign leaders who attend Victory Day celebrations are often perceived as expressing diplomatic goodwill, and the potential presence of a US president at such an event would carry significant symbolic weight.

While Trump acknowledged that May 9 is “pretty soon,” he did not dismiss the idea entirely, instead stating that a visit would occur “at the appropriate time.” This leaves room for speculation that, should peace negotiations progress swiftly, a trip to Moscow could be on the table later in the year.

Trump’s openness to visiting Moscow coincides with his active involvement in peace negotiations between Russia and Ukraine. On February 12, he held a 90-minute phone conversation with Putin, during which both leaders agreed to start negotiations aimed at ending the conflict.

In a subsequent development, high-level discussions between US and Russian officials took place in Saudi Arabia, focusing on establishing a framework for a potential peace deal and improving bilateral relations. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov described these talks as “very useful,” emphasizing that, for the first time, the US delegation appeared willing to listen to Moscow’s concerns.

Trump has been vocal in his belief that the Ukraine conflict could be resolved within weeks, a timeline many analysts view as ambitious given the entrenched positions of both sides. However, his push for negotiations and direct dialogue with Russia suggests a shift away from the confrontational stance that has characterized US policy under previous administrations.

If Trump were to visit Moscow, it would mark a significant departure from the precedent set during his first term in office (2017–2021). Neither he nor Putin visited each other’s countries during that period, instead limiting their interactions to meetings at international summits.

Historically, US presidential visits to Russia have been rare but consequential. The last US president to visit Moscow was Barack Obama in 2009, during an effort to “reset” US-Russia relations. Before that, George W. Bush traveled to Russia multiple times, emphasizing cooperation in counterterrorism and arms control.

A Trump visit to Moscow would inevitably draw scrutiny from political opponents and media outlets, many of whom have long criticized his perceived willingness to engage with Putin. However, supporters argue that direct engagement with Russia is necessary to de-escalate tensions and achieve tangible diplomatic outcomes.

Trump’s comments have already sparked backlash from political opponents who view any overtures toward Moscow with skepticism. Many lawmakers in Washington remain deeply critical of Russia’s actions in Ukraine and argue that any attempt to normalize relations should be contingent on major concessions from Moscow, including a full withdrawal from Ukrainian territory.

Furthermore, NATO allies may express concerns over Trump’s approach, particularly those in Eastern Europe who view a strong US commitment to countering Russian aggression as essential for their security. The possibility of a high-profile Trump-Putin meeting could also complicate relations with European partners who have aligned closely with Washington in supporting Kyiv.

On the domestic front, the potential for a visit could become a contentious issue in the upcoming US presidential election, with opponents likely to use it as evidence of Trump’s alleged softness on Russia. However, Trump has consistently dismissed such criticisms, arguing that his approach prioritizes American interests by seeking peace and reducing military entanglements.

While no official plans have been made for a Moscow visit, Trump’s comments indicate a willingness to engage directly with Russia should the conditions align. His assertion that the Ukraine conflict could be resolved “within weeks” suggests that he envisions rapid progress in negotiations, though achieving such an outcome remains highly uncertain.

If a Trump-Putin meeting were to materialize, it would mark a significant moment in US-Russia relations, potentially reshaping diplomatic dynamics for years to come. Whether such an engagement leads to substantive policy shifts or remains symbolic will depend on the outcomes of ongoing peace talks and broader geopolitical considerations.

For now, Trump’s openness to visiting Moscow remains conditional on a resolution to the Ukraine conflict. As diplomatic efforts continue, the prospect of a historic meeting between the US and Russian leaders lingers as a possibility-one that could redefine the trajectory of global politics in the months ahead.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel