As delegates from across the globe convened in Baku, Azerbaijan, for the 2024 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP29), the atmosphere was charged with anticipation-and cynicism. While leaders from the Global North touted their ambitious green transition plans, nations in the Global South braced for another round of unmet promises and stalled progress. The widening gulf between rich and poor countries in addressing climate change was more evident than ever, with this year’s conference threatening to become a turning point for developing nations demanding action over rhetoric.

The seeds of discontent were sown long before COP29. In 2009, wealthy nations pledged $100 billion annually in climate finance by 2020. Yet, in 2024, this target remains unmet. Worse still, even if fulfilled, the amount would fall far short of the $1.3 trillion per year that developing countries, including India and many African nations, say they need to address the dual challenges of adaptation and mitigation.

“Climate finance is not charity; it is an obligation,” India’s environment minister stated recently, encapsulating the frustration felt across the Global South. The sentiment is echoed in Africa, where countries like Mozambique, Zambia, and the Democratic Republic of Congo bear the brunt of climate disasters caused primarily by the emissions of developed nations. Despite enduring catastrophic cyclones, flooding, and drought, African nations receive just 3% of global climate finance. This glaring inequity traps vulnerable countries in a relentless cycle of destruction and poverty.

One of the most contentious debates at COP29 centered around the growing reliance on private investment to fund climate initiatives. Developed nations have championed private capital as a “game-changer,” but countries in the Global South view this shift as a dangerous abdication of responsibility.

“Shifting the burden to private investors absolves governments of accountability,” said a negotiator from the G77 bloc, representing developing countries in the UN. Critics argue that private finance often prioritizes market returns, sidelining the poorest and most vulnerable communities. Renewable energy projects in sub-Saharan Africa illustrate this disparity. While private firms invest heavily in urban solar and wind initiatives, rural areas-where the need is greatest-are often overlooked. This patchwork approach to progress leaves millions without access to sustainable energy solutions, deepening existing inequalities.

Adding to the frustration is the record presence of over 1,700 fossil fuel lobbyists at COP29. Their influence looms large over negotiations, sparking accusations of undermining efforts to phase out coal, oil, and gas. Small island nations, already grappling with rising sea levels, have decried the hypocrisy of allowing fossil fuel interests to dominate climate discussions.

“It’s like inviting arsonists to a fire safety conference,” quipped one frustrated delegate. The irony is stark: while vulnerable countries plead for urgent action, fossil fuel lobbyists work to slow transitions and safeguard their profits. This dynamic perpetuates a global system where those least responsible for climate change suffer the most.

While developing nations struggle with existential threats, G20 countries-responsible for 75 percent of global emissions-continue to fall short on their commitments. A recent report by the Council on Energy, Environment, and Water (CEEW) highlighted glaring gaps in emission reduction policies among major economies.

The United States, despite its much-lauded Inflation Reduction Act, remains off-track to meet the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C target. Similarly, European nations have faced difficulties balancing their green ambitions with growing energy demands and political resistance. This hypocrisy has not gone unnoticed. “How can rich nations preach sustainability while continuing to finance coal plants abroad?” asked an African delegate.

One of the few positive outcomes of COP28 was the establishment of a Loss and Damage Fund to compensate vulnerable nations for climate-related destruction. However, implementation remains stalled. Without an operational framework or guaranteed funding, the fund risks becoming another hollow promise.

For countries like Pakistan, which suffered catastrophic floods in 2022 that displaced over 30 million people, the stakes couldn’t be higher. “This fund is not a luxury; it’s a necessity,” said Pakistan’s climate minister. Yet, with no concrete action, the fund may join the long list of climate initiatives plagued by delays and diluted commitments.

The statistics paint a grim picture. In 2024, Africa will pay $163 billion in debt service-funds that could otherwise be used for climate adaptation. Meanwhile, the fossil fuel industry enjoys annual profits in the trillions, bolstered by $1 trillion in global subsidies in 2022 alone. These disparities highlight the moral and economic inconsistencies of the current global climate framework.

While the Global North demands emissions reductions from countries like India, whose per capita emissions are a fraction of those in developed nations, it continues to finance carbon-intensive projects abroad. This double standard undermines trust and stymies meaningful progress.

As COP29 drew to a close, the central question was not just whether wealthy nations would listen to the demands of the Global South but whether they would act. Countries like Brazil, South Africa, and Indonesia are calling for a more equitable global climate architecture, emphasizing debt relief, fair trade policies, and technology transfers.

Pope Francis recently weighed in, urging “a bold and creative rethinking of the global financial system.” His message resonates particularly in Africa, where debt servicing often eclipses spending on health and education. Leaders from the Global South are no longer content to be passive recipients of aid. Instead, they demand fairness and structural change.

The COP29 conference ended with more delays and diluted commitments, a failure not just of diplomacy but of humanity. Climate change is a global crisis requiring collective solutions, yet the burden remains unevenly distributed. “We’re not asking for favors; we’re asking for fairness,” said one African delegate.

Perhaps the most poignant reminder came from a young activist in Nairobi holding a sign that read: “You broke it. You fix it.” The message is unambiguous. It’s time for the Global North to match its rhetoric with action or risk losing what little credibility it has left. As another activist’s sign proclaimed, “The house is on fire.” Whether COP29 will extinguish the flames or let them spread unchecked remains an open question-but time is running out.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel