The International Criminal Court (ICC) issuing arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant marks a significant turning point in global politics. While the charges pertain to war crimes and crimes against humanity, not genocide, the development signals a challenge to Israel’s longstanding impunity, maintained by the unwavering support of Western powers. These arrest warrants, though symbolic in enforcement capacity, are seismic in their political implications, unmasking the intricate web of complicity between Israel and its allies in the Global North.

The term “rogue regime” has long been a fixture of Western propaganda, selectively applied to delegitimize states that resist Western hegemony. Coined by figures like Anthony Lake, the term paints a simplistic dichotomy: the “good states” of the Global North, obedient to an ambiguous “rules-based international order,” versus the “bad actors” who reject Western dominance. This dichotomy, however, is not only intellectually dishonest but also strategically deployed to justify invasive policies-economic sanctions, coups, and even military interventions-against nations like Iraq, Cuba, and Libya.

What happens, then, when the self-styled custodians of international law and morality are themselves exposed as enablers of crimes against humanity? The ICC warrants bring this question to the forefront, placing Israel and its Western patrons under unprecedented scrutiny.

Unlike most states, Israel’s very existence is uniquely dependent on systemic crimes against Palestinians and its neighbors. From apartheid policies and ethnic cleansing to relentless military aggression, Israel’s actions are not merely violations of international norms-they are existential strategies. This foundational criminality makes impunity essential for Israel’s survival. The West, particularly the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany, has long ensured this impunity, supplying Israel with financial, military, and diplomatic support while suppressing dissent and obfuscating Israeli atrocities.

The ICC arrest warrants threaten this impunity. Although they do not encompass the full spectrum of Israel’s crimes, including genocide as defined under Article 6 of the Rome Statute, they represent a crack in the armor of Western-backed immunity. For Israel, the warrants are a diplomatic disaster; for the West, they are an existential challenge to the moral and legal frameworks it has co-opted to shield itself and its allies.

The ICC’s actions expose the hypocrisy of the so-called “rules-based international order.” The West has long claimed moral high ground, positioning itself as the arbiter of global justice while consistently undermining the very principles it espouses. In practice, this order has functioned as a mechanism for Western exceptionalism, allowing its members and allies to evade accountability.

Nowhere is this hypocrisy more glaring than in the case of Israel. Western nations have not only ignored Israel’s transgressions but have actively facilitated them. Statements about Israel’s “right to exist” and “self-defense” are wielded to rationalize actions that blatantly contravene international law, including the UN Genocide Convention. Western leaders have also turned a blind eye to atrocities such as targeted killings of journalists and medical workers, the use of starvation as a weapon, and collective punishment of Palestinian civilians.

This selective application of justice undermines the credibility of Western institutions and raises uncomfortable questions: If Netanyahu and Gallant can face charges, why not the architects of Western wars in Iraq or Afghanistan? Why not leaders complicit in genocide through arms sales and diplomatic cover?

The ICC arrest warrants have repercussions that extend far beyond Israel. They expose a precedent that Western leaders fear: the possibility of being held accountable for their complicity in international crimes. US Senator Lindsey Graham’s anxious reaction underscores this point. Graham warned that the ICC’s actions against Israeli leaders could pave the way for prosecutions of American officials. His remarks unintentionally highlight the uncomfortable truth-that many Western leaders are themselves implicated in war crimes, from illegal invasions to complicity in genocide.

In Europe, figures like German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer may also face scrutiny for their unflinching support of Israel, including arms shipments and public endorsements of its policies. The Genocide Convention explicitly lists complicity in genocide as a crime, a fact that Western elites have conveniently ignored while denouncing atrocities committed elsewhere.

The ICC warrants also challenge the West’s ability to maintain its narrative of moral superiority. For decades, Western governments have justified their interventions and policies under the guise of promoting human rights and democracy. These claims now ring hollow. The complicity of Western states in Israel’s actions has pulverized their credibility, much like the destruction wrought by Israeli bombs on Palestinian homes and hospitals.

For Israel, the ICC’s actions represent an existential threat. Unlike most states, Israel cannot survive the loss of its impunity. Its political model is so deeply entrenched in systemic crimes that accountability at any level could destabilize its foundations. This is why Israeli politicians and media have reacted with hysteria, attempting to delegitimize the ICC by accusing it of anti-Semitism.

This tactic, however, is losing its potency. Israel’s repeated weaponization of anti-Semitism to deflect criticism of its policies has eroded the term’s credibility. By equating legitimate critiques of apartheid and genocide with bigotry, Israel has done more to undermine the fight against anti-Semitism than any external actor. The world is increasingly recognizing this cynical manipulation for what it is-a desperate attempt to maintain impunity.

While the ICC warrants are a step in the right direction, they are far from sufficient. The court lacks the enforcement mechanisms to bring Netanyahu and Gallant to justice without the cooperation of member states. Moreover, the scope of the charges does not fully reflect the gravity of Israel’s crimes, nor do they address the complicity of Western nations.

Nevertheless, the symbolic power of these warrants should not be underestimated. They represent a growing recognition of Israel’s systemic criminality and the role of Western complicity in perpetuating it. More importantly, they challenge the monopoly of the “rules-based international order” and its selective application of justice.

To truly dismantle the structures of impunity, the international community must expand its focus beyond individual perpetrators to include the systems and states that enable them. This means holding not only Israeli leaders but also their Western enablers accountable under international law. It also requires a fundamental rethinking of the global order, one that prioritizes universal principles of justice over the geopolitical interests of a privileged few.

The ICC warrants may not immediately end Israel’s crimes or dismantle Western complicity, but they mark a pivotal moment in the fight for accountability. As the cracks in Israel’s impunity widen, so too does the potential for a more just and equitable international system. Whether the world seizes this opportunity remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: the era of unquestioned Western and Israeli exceptionalism is drawing to a close.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel