In the recent US elections, one of the biggest losers-aside from the Democratic Party-was the mainstream media, often referred to as “corporate media,” encompassing traditional news channels, newspapers, and magazines. Once seen as the dominant force in shaping public opinion, this sector now faces a credibility crisis, grappling with the aftermath of election outcomes that its pollsters and pundits completely misread. The election’s unexpected results not only highlighted the deep disconnect between mainstream media and the public but also underscored the rise of new media platforms as influential players in political discourse.

Leading up to the election, nearly every major news outlet, from CNN and MSNBC to conservative media, forecast a tight race that was supposedly too close to call. Yet, these predictions missed the mark entirely. Such an oversight raises questions about the methodologies used and whether traditional news media still has its finger on the pulse of American public opinion. As mainstream outlets missed crucial elements in voter sentiment, younger audiences increasingly tuned to digital platforms, from podcasts to social media, for more immediate and perceivedly authentic perspectives.

One clear example of the shift was Elon Musk’s platform, X (formerly Twitter), hosting Donald Trump’s interview with Joe Rogan, a popular US podcaster with a massive online following. Rogan’s listenership dwarfs that of traditional news networks, with 14.5 million followers on Spotify and 17.9 million on YouTube, and he gained more than 400,000 new followers after the interview. As Rogan’s influence highlights, many young Americans are moving away from conventional cable networks, often viewing them as biased, towards alternative sources that allow them to form their own conclusions without overt editorial slants.

There are several reasons for the steady decline in mainstream media’s influence. As information sources continue to diversify, the audience for traditional media has fragmented, and alternative media choices-often free, digital, and accessible anytime-are filling the void. Younger generations, especially, feel less trust in mainstream outlets, which they often perceive as partisan, towing the party line more than conveying unfiltered truths. This phenomenon has become more pronounced during coverage of international issues, such as the Israel-Gaza conflict, where mainstream media’s reporting is often critiqued for upholding government narratives and failing to adequately cover humanitarian crises.

Amateur videos from conflict zones, such as those posted from Gaza on social media platforms like X and TikTok, have offered unfiltered views of events on the ground, often starkly contrasting with mainstream media reports. The immediacy and raw authenticity of these posts fuel public distrust in traditional outlets, exposing double standards in coverage and furthering skepticism among viewers. Citizen journalism is growing, and social media is giving voices to perspectives that challenge the sanitized, sometimes selective, narratives provided by major news corporations.

Mainstream media’s viewership has been dwindling steadily over the past decade. During the recent election, MSNBC’s viewership dropped from 7.3 million in 2020 to 5.5 million, while Fox News fell from 13.7 million to 9.8 million. Younger generations prefer digital sources that are more affordable and interactive. Traditional media’s high subscription fees and static, one-way presentation make it less appealing to audiences accustomed to instant, participatory news experiences.

Newspapers have also taken a hit, with circulation numbers plummeting since the 1980s. In 2022, daily newspaper circulation (both print and digital) stood at just 20.9 million, an 8 percent decline from the previous year. Meanwhile, the number of newspapers has decreased dramatically, with about 6,000 remaining in the US compared to nearly 24,000 in the early 20th century. Even The New York Times, a leading national publication, has fewer than 300,000 print subscribers, though its digital model has allowed it to diversify, attracting more than 8.8 million online subscribers.

The rise of social media platforms-each with millions, if not billions, of users-has forever altered mass communication. X, Facebook, and TikTok reach far more people than any traditional media platform can. Podcasts and newsletters on Substack also lure readers away from mainstream outlets, providing specialized and often uncensored content. Unlike traditional media, these platforms offer a “democratized” approach, where voices from varied backgrounds, ideologies, and expertise levels can contribute.

Yet, this new media landscape has its risks. Platforms owned by powerful billionaires are not immune from bias. For instance, Musk’s control over X has raised concerns that his personal and political views may influence the content algorithms. Facebook faces similar scrutiny, especially with allegations that pro-Palestine content has been censored or deprioritized under its community guidelines. These concerns reveal that, while new media offers a broader range of perspectives, it remains vulnerable to the same pitfalls as traditional media, including issues of censorship and editorial bias.

Younger audiences are particularly skeptical of what they perceive as mainstream media’s partisan alignment, especially on contentious topics like immigration, foreign policy, and conflicts such as the war in Ukraine or Gaza. Mainstream outlets often reflect the perspectives of their affiliated political or corporate interests, a trend that has become apparent during coverage of hot-button issues. Trump’s characterization of mainstream outlets as “fake news” has resonated with a large segment of the population, giving rise to a culture of distrust toward corporate media.

Amid these shifts, citizen journalism-enabled by social media platforms-has become an increasingly viable alternative for news consumption. The widespread distribution of firsthand accounts and unfiltered footage on platforms like X and TikTok has intensified global conversations around topics mainstream media is seen to avoid or misrepresent, driving waves of public opinion and, at times, large-scale protests.

While the emergence of new media has democratized the information landscape, it is not without challenges. Many digital platforms, like Facebook and Google, face antitrust accusations due to their size and the degree to which they control online content. The nature of social media algorithms, which prioritize engagement, can also amplify sensationalized, unverified content over accurate journalism, contributing to the spread of misinformation.

Additionally, foreign actors like Russia and Israel have reportedly manipulated social media with bots to sway public opinion and spread propaganda. This digital information warfare underscores that the new media era, while leveling the playing field for content creation, carries its own biases and dangers.

The US has long led the world in media innovation, eagerly adopting new platforms and technologies. Yet, the question remains: What does the future hold for traditional journalism? Mainstream media is no longer the gatekeeper of information, but rather one of many players in an increasingly fragmented landscape. Younger generations demand transparency and authenticity, with expectations of a media environment that values truth over corporate or political interests.

For journalism to maintain relevance, it must adapt to these evolving expectations. New media might one day face the same skepticism now directed at mainstream outlets, yet its appeal lies in its flexibility and responsiveness to public demand for accountability. The future of journalism may lie not in one model over the other but in a hybrid that combines rigorous reporting standards with the adaptability of digital media, serving audiences with a broad spectrum of perspectives and an unwavering commitment to truth.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel