The impending announcement from US President-elect Donald Trump on a peace initiative for Ukraine has generated significant international attention, with Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk stating that the Republican leader could outline a demilitarized zone and provide new security guarantees for Kyiv in the coming days. This development comes as Trump has reiterated his campaign trail vow to resolve the Ukraine conflict within 24 hours. Tusk, who shared his insights during an interview on Polish Radio, anticipates a major shift in US policy toward Ukraine and suggests Europe must prepare for a “new political landscape” as Trump takes office.

The Wall Street Journal recently reported that Trump’s team is contemplating various proposals, with one prominent option being a freeze on the current military front lines, paired with Ukraine’s potential suspension of its NATO ambitions for up to 20 years. Trump’s peace proposal, Tusk suggests, is likely to involve a notable reduction in US involvement in Ukraine, and may transfer peacekeeping responsibilities to European nations rather than US-led international bodies. For Europe, this plan could signal a shift that balances de-escalation with maintaining Ukraine’s sovereignty, albeit with complex compromises.

Throughout his campaign, Trump emphasized that he would resolve the Ukraine conflict within “24 hours,” although he avoided specifics. His direct message to Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky – “No more. You got to make a deal” – indicates an emphasis on negotiation over prolonged military engagement. Trump’s approach appears to reflect his intention to leverage military and financial support to influence both Kyiv and Moscow, an approach distinct from President Joe Biden’s long-standing support for Ukraine’s full defense.

During his campaign, Trump often criticized the US government’s extensive support for Ukraine, suggesting it has prolonged the conflict unnecessarily. A key component of his vision for peace includes a reduced American footprint in Ukrainian affairs, a strategy that resonates with some war-weary constituents in the US and may find tentative support among European leaders wary of conflict escalation.

According to the Wall Street Journal, one of the most discussed proposals within Trump’s circle involves establishing a demilitarized zone along the existing front line in Ukraine. Rather than deploying American troops or depending on United Nations forces, the plan reportedly suggests that European countries would take on a primary role in maintaining peace in the proposed zone. This option reflects Trump’s preference for “burden-sharing” in defense matters, which would reduce direct American involvement while pressing European allies to shoulder more responsibility for regional security.

For many in Europe, however, the prospect of taking on this role is both a challenge and a potential source of tension. European leaders, particularly those in the Nordic and Baltic states, are concerned about being caught between an assertive Russia and a more isolationist US policy under Trump. Tusk’s plans to meet with French President Emmanuel Macron, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, and other European leaders signify that Europe is preparing for a significant strategic realignment and may be willing to explore this path if it means avoiding escalation and achieving stability in Ukraine.

While details of Trump’s plan remain speculative, it’s apparent that any peace initiative will require significant concessions from Ukraine. Proposals to freeze the conflict along the current front lines and suspend Ukraine’s NATO ambitions for 20 years would likely face strong resistance in Kyiv. Ukrainian leaders have consistently prioritized NATO membership as a cornerstone of their defense policy, seeing it as critical to preventing further Russian aggression. However, under Trump’s proposed plan, this ambition may be set aside temporarily to prioritize an immediate cessation of hostilities.

Security guarantees for Ukraine are another core issue. If Trump’s peace terms indeed aim to minimize American intervention, the type and enforceability of these guarantees will be critical. Any guarantee of Ukrainian sovereignty would likely need to involve concrete measures, potentially including multinational oversight from European nations, which Trump’s team is reportedly exploring. Yet, Tusk’s comments suggest that a significant withdrawal of US direct involvement might undermine Ukraine’s leverage in any peace negotiations.

Trump’s approach to Ukraine has broader implications for NATO, an alliance he has often criticized for expecting too much from the United States. A diminished American role in Ukraine could have profound implications for NATO’s eastern strategy, especially in states bordering Russia or within proximity of the conflict. Poland and the Baltic countries, in particular, view US engagement in the region as essential to their national security. Tusk’s statement that “nobody wants Ukraine to weaken or capitulate” reflects widespread European concerns that a rapid American disengagement could weaken the security framework that Eastern European states rely upon.

However, Trump’s plan to limit US involvement could push NATO members to increase their defense contributions and take on a more active role in ensuring stability within their borders. While NATO’s Secretary-General Mark Rutte is likely to be involved in discussions regarding Trump’s peace proposal, his role will be crucial in mediating between the alliance’s traditional expectations and a potentially new strategic direction under the next US administration.

Tusk’s reference to a “new political landscape” signals more than just a shift in the US-Ukraine policy; it hints at a transformation of European security dynamics in response to Trump’s anticipated approach. European nations may soon need to address how to balance support for Ukraine while avoiding escalation with Russia. The prospect of a “frozen” conflict with diminished American oversight raises questions about how Europe will navigate its relationship with both Ukraine and Russia under this new paradigm.

Tusk’s planned meetings with European leaders emphasize that a recalibration of priorities is underway in response to Trump’s impending policy shift. Nations like France, the UK, and regional powers in Scandinavia and the Baltics will likely play significant roles in deciding whether to support a peace framework that entails a demilitarized zone, NATO’s adjusted role, and long-term security arrangements for Ukraine.

If Trump’s administration successfully implements a peace plan that reduces US involvement and fosters European leadership in maintaining regional stability, it could set a new precedent for conflict resolution in Eastern Europe. However, the success of this approach depends on European unity and the ability of Ukraine and its allies to negotiate terms that do not undermine Kyiv’s sovereignty.

The weeks ahead will likely bring more concrete details on Trump’s peace proposal. As Trump’s team finalizes the roadmap, the international community will be closely watching to see whether his bold promises can materialize into a durable solution for Ukraine. Whether this vision brings about lasting peace or further strains the alliances between the US, Europe, and Ukraine, Trump’s policy will undeniably shape the future of European security and the dynamics of NATO for years to come.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel