As the 2024 US presidential election looms, one candidate stands poised to make history: Kamala Harris. If she wins, she would become the first female president of the United States, breaking one of the country’s longest-standing barriers.

Kamala, a woman of diverse heritage, has risen from a district attorney to US Senator, and finally Vice President. Her anticipated victory would not only be symbolic but would also set new precedents for women and minorities in leadership roles. However, her campaign has underscored that she does not merely intend to serve as the successor to the Joe Biden, but rather as a leader with her own vision and direction for America.

In American politics, it is widely understood that the Democratic Party’s core policies have long been influenced by the Barack Obama and Clintons. President Joe Biden’s term has largely followed the trajectory set by his predecessors, particularly Obama. Biden’s approach leaned heavily toward global diplomacy, climate change, social equity, and a multilateral worldview. As his Vice President, Kamala Harris initially aligned with this legacy, praising the Obama-Biden policies and reiterating her commitment to these causes.

However, in recent months, as she transitions from the shadow of Biden’s tenure to the forefront of her own campaign, Kamala has deliberately distanced herself from the policies of the Biden administration. Rather than simply extending the Biden legacy, she has promised a presidency reflective of a new era and a younger generation’s aspirations. By clearly articulating her intention to pursue policies independent of Biden’s, Kamala has appealed to a demographic that seeks a leader focused on contemporary issues, especially those impacting American society domestically. Her shift underscores a conscious break from the past and a step toward carving out a legacy distinct from her predecessors.

One of the significant shifts in Kamala’s campaign has been her approach toward nationalism. Unlike previous Democratic presidents, who often embraced globalist views, Kamala Harris has signaled a prioritization of domestic issues over international engagements. This strategy speaks to an emerging sentiment within the American electorate: many Americans are increasingly concerned with internal economic challenges and are disillusioned with prolonged involvement in foreign conflicts.

Voters today feel the pressure of rising inflation, income inequality, and job instability, which they believe should take precedence over issues abroad. There is a growing sentiment that tax dollars should be invested in infrastructure, healthcare, education, and economic recovery, rather than foreign wars. Kamala, sensitive to this shift, has crafted a campaign that resonates with this desire for change. She is aligning herself as a leader who will focus on building a strong, economically stable, and united America, a nation that can fulfill the “American Dream” for all. Her slogan could be summarized as wanting to make America a land of opportunity once again, particularly for immigrants and young people.

Kamala also aims to counterbalance the divisive rhetoric of figures like Donald Trump, who has pledged to seek retribution against his political adversaries if elected. Kamala’s message, by contrast, has been one of reconciliation, unity, and restoring faith in the US as a nation of possibilities. She acknowledges that America’s diversity is its strength and promises to create a more inclusive, hopeful environment. This appeal to unity, combined with a domestic focus, could prove to be a defining characteristic of a Kamala presidency.

Kamala Harris’s personal and political connection to India sets her apart on the international stage, particularly regarding the US strategy in this region. With her Indian heritage and nuanced understanding of the complexities in South Asia, Kamala is expected to prioritize this region in ways previous US presidents have not. Amid the evolving relationship between India and China, a Kamala administration may work to strengthen partnerships in South Asia, with a particular focus on India as a key player in the US Indo-Pacific strategy.

Given her cultural ties and diplomatic insight, Kamala Harris may work closely with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, likely fostering deeper strategic and economic partnerships. By drawing India closer, she could advance the US agenda of balancing China’s influence in the region. Her administration might leverage diplomatic channels to encourage stability in Pakistan, which often experiences political turbulence, impacting regional peace. Additionally, Bangladesh could experience a shift in its political landscape, favoring policies that align more closely with US-India interests.

Kamala’s approach to South Asia would mark a distinct pivot from the Biden administration’s more generalized approach to global engagement. Her South Asian heritage could help bridge diplomatic gaps, establishing an era of nuanced, heritage-driven foreign policy that prioritizes allies and stability in one of the most complex regions of the world.

One of the clearest distinctions between Kamala Harris’s potential presidency and Joe Biden’s term would be her stance on ongoing global conflicts. Biden’s policies have emphasized the US’s role as a global defender of democracy, which has translated into prolonged involvement in crises like the Ukraine conflict. While Biden’s approach is in line with long-standing American globalist policies, which seek to maintain stability worldwide, this approach has been met with mixed reactions domestically, especially as Americans question the financial and strategic value of these engagements.

Kamala’s campaign indicates that she may take a less interventionist approach, particularly concerning the Ukraine war. She could advocate for peace talks or increased diplomatic pressure, aiming to conclude the conflict without continued US financial involvement. Similarly, on the Middle East front, Kamala may adopt a policy less supportive of unconditional military aid, especially regarding the Israel-Palestine issue. She might exert pressure on Israel to consider a two-state solution, marking a significant shift in US policy on this front.

Kamala’s approach reflects her understanding of the modern American voter, who is increasingly weary of “forever wars” and would prefer to see taxpayer dollars directed toward domestic challenges. A Kamala presidency could represent a turn inward, where US foreign policy is measured against tangible benefits to American citizens, rather than maintaining a high-cost global presence.

Kamala Harris has the potential to become one of the most transformative figures in American political history. By possibly winning the November 5 election, she could become the first female president of the United States, an achievement that would inspire generations of women and minorities. However, her historical significance extends beyond breaking gender and racial barriers. Kamala’s campaign has emphasized a distinct departure from her predecessors, highlighting a shift toward a more nationalist agenda. She has presented herself as a candidate of the people, one who understands the domestic challenges Americans face and who is committed to an inclusive, forward-thinking vision of America, next the lady Gorge Washington.

Despite such expectations, if Kamala Harris too steps into the war-mongering agendas of Joe Biden and opts to serve as a mere puppet of Obama and Clintons, she would quickly become unpopular thus facing external and internal criticisms. She may even abruptly end her tenure similarly as Richard Nixon. Most importantly, Kamala Harris needs to remember, it was Obama and Clintons, who stopped her from performing and used media in portraying her as dumbest vice president in American history.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel