The opening of the 79th UN General Assembly (UNGA) in New York this week was overshadowed by grim news from the Middle East. Israel’s intense bombing campaign against the Iran-backed Hezbollah in Lebanon took center stage, with live footage showing missiles raining down on southern Lebanon, leaving more than 500 people dead and hundreds more injured in just 24 hours. This eruption of violence was yet another reminder of the escalating tensions in the region and the fragile state of global peace.

This latest conflict adds to an already long list of adversities raging around the world, once again exposing the cracks in the international order and the limitations of global organizations like the United Nations. With trust between major global powers at an all-time low, the UN appears increasingly impotent, unable to effectively manage, let alone resolve, the world’s crises. As we face growing divisions between Western nations and their allies on one side, and Russia, China, and much of the so-called “global majority” on the other, the UN seems unable to prevent conflicts from spiraling out of control.

Diplomats at the UNGA in New York are undoubtedly working tirelessly to de-escalate the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah. But their efforts, like so many others, appear to be bogged down by the deepening global rift. The UN has largely lost its ability to influence key players like Israel or Hezbollah, both of which act with increasing impunity in the absence of a credible international deterrent.

Attempts to broker ceasefires in other areas of the region, such as Gaza, where Israel has waged an 11-month campaign of airstrikes, have consistently failed. The inability to secure peace in Gaza, coupled with a similar lack of progress in Lebanon, underscores the UN’s growing irrelevance when it comes to imposing peace and order in conflict zones.

This pattern of failure has been apparent for over two decades, with the UN struggling to orchestrate meaningful diplomatic interventions. The organization’s repeated failures to bring an end to violence in Syria, Yemen, Sudan, and other hotspots have led to a significant erosion of its authority.

The last time the UN played a meaningful role in resolving a global crisis was during the 2008 financial meltdown, and even then, its efforts were overshadowed by the G20 and other institutions. Two key failures since then have significantly eroded trust in the organization: the intervention in Libya in 2011 and the UN’s inability to unite against the Syrian regime.

In Libya, a UN resolution authorizing the use of force to protect civilians ultimately led to the overthrow of Muammar Qaddafi’s regime. Russia, which viewed the resolution as a betrayal, felt that the West had used the UN as a tool for regime change. This set the stage for Moscow’s growing disillusionment with the UN, which continues to this day.

In Syria, despite the use of chemical weapons against civilians, the UN failed to forge a united global front against Bashar al-Assad’s government. This not only exacerbated the humanitarian disaster but also further diminished the credibility of the UN as a force for peace.

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has repeatedly warned of the dangers posed by unchecked global conflicts, inequality, and geopolitical division. This week, in a powerful speech, Guterres lamented that impunity, inequality, and uncertainty were pushing the world toward an “unsustainable” future, teetering on the edge of a “powder keg.” Yet his warnings, like those of his predecessors, are likely to fall on deaf ears.

The deepening geopolitical divide-between liberal democracies and authoritarian regimes, between the wealthy North and the impoverished South-leaves the UN increasingly toothless. Even the UN’s ability to respond to newer threats like climate change, artificial intelligence, and nuclear proliferation is constrained by this rift.

The failure to bring an end to Israel’s campaign against Hamas in Gaza, as well as the involvement of Iran-backed militias across the Middle East, further underscores the UN’s weakening influence. The Houthis in Yemen, for instance, have been attacking shipping vessels in the Red Sea with little global response.

The UNGA, meanwhile, faces a growing list of humanitarian needs, while funding continues to shrink. With more than 2 billion people living in conflict-affected areas, many are fleeing to more stable countries as refugees, putting additional strain on global stability.

Global discord extends beyond the Middle East. The Ukraine war rages on, with no end in sight, while the conflict in Sudan has become another protracted humanitarian catastrophe. Both crises highlight the limitations of global diplomacy in an increasingly fractured world.

As the world faces multiple simultaneous crises, it is becoming clear that the UN, while still an important platform for discussion, has lost much of its power to influence meaningful change. This decline raises a pressing question: Is the UN Charter, created in 1945 in the aftermath of World War II, still relevant today?

While the situation may seem bleak, there is still hope. As the world hurtles toward more discord and conflict, there is a growing call for a reassessment of the UN’s role and mission. The 1945 UN Charter, which enshrined the principle of “right makes might”-as opposed to “might makes right”-could serve as a foundation for renewed global cooperation. However, such a renewal would require trust, something that is currently in short supply.

If the UN is to remain relevant in the 21st century, world leaders must once again place their faith in diplomacy and multilateralism. This is no small task in a world where power dynamics have shifted, and where countries like China, Russia, and the US are more concerned with geopolitical maneuvering than with securing lasting peace.

The world is facing its most profound governance crisis since the establishment of the modern state system. The UN, long a forum for competing forces, now seems unable to keep up with the demands of an increasingly complex world. If the international community is to avoid further chaos, a reinvigorated UN is needed, one that can act as a genuine force for peace and prosperity. Without such reforms, the future looks increasingly uncertain, as global conflicts threaten to spiral out of control.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel