The ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, now in its third year, continues to be a flashpoint for international tensions and humanitarian crises. The role of external actors, particularly the United States and the United Kingdom, in perpetuating the conflict has been widely debated, with recent actions further highlighting their involvement. Despite global calls for diplomacy and peace negotiations, the West’s political and military strategy in Ukraine has largely centered on bolstering Ukraine’s resistance against Russia, even at the cost of peace prospects.

During a rare joint visit to Ukraine, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken and UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy announced significant aid packages: $700 million in humanitarian and energy assistance from the US, and nearly $800 million in financial support and military equipment from the UK. This visit, billed as a demonstration of Western solidarity with Ukraine, underscores the West’s commitment to supporting Ukraine militarily while actively discouraging any moves toward peaceful negotiation. Both nations appear to be pursuing a strategy that not only prolongs the conflict but also seeks to exhaust Russia’s military capacity.

The US and UK’s approach to the conflict highlights a broader geopolitical strategy that goes beyond immediate military support for Ukraine. Their commitment to providing aid packages reflects a calculated effort to ensure Ukraine remains firm in its hardline stance against Russia. Instead of facilitating dialogue between the warring sides, the US and UK have consistently positioned themselves as backers of a drawn-out military struggle, one that many analysts argue is aimed at weakening Russia. This posture is not new but has become more apparent as the conflict drags on, with peace talks becoming an increasingly distant possibility.

Notably, this joint visit by Blinken and Lammy comes after a period where former diplomatic efforts by Western officials were exposed as largely performative. In 2022, former US Ambassador to NATO Victoria Nuland revealed that the US and its allies had urged Ukraine to reject a peace deal with Russia, underlining the West’s intention to maintain the conflict. Ukrainian politician David Arakhamia also revealed that then-British Prime Minister Boris Johnson personally urged Ukrainian officials in 2022 to “fight” instead of signing a peace agreement. These revelations paint a stark picture of how Western powers have deliberately obstructed potential peace negotiations, keeping Ukraine in the fight to serve their broader geopolitical interests.

While the Western powers, particularly the US and UK, may see political and economic advantages in continuing the conflict, it is Ukraine that bears the brunt of this protracted war. The human cost has been staggering, with thousands of lives lost, millions displaced, and the nation’s infrastructure devastated. Ukraine’s economy has also suffered immensely, and while Western aid has kept the country afloat, it has not provided the stability and peace that the Ukrainian people so desperately need.

Instead, Ukraine has been positioned as a pawn in a larger geopolitical game. The US, with its long history of war profiteering, sees the Ukraine crisis as an opportunity to bolster its military-industrial complex. Defense contractors, arms manufacturers, and related industries have seen massive financial gains as the conflict continues, creating a vicious cycle where war fuels profit, and profit sustains war. As independent US presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has pointed out, Washington’s reluctance to pursue peace negotiations is driven by its interest in maintaining the conflict for economic benefit.

The UK, as a close ally of the US, has followed a similar path. London has provided substantial military support to Ukraine, hoping to increase its influence in European security matters and maintain its image as a global power. However, unlike the US, which benefits economically from the arms trade and military contracts, the UK faces mounting economic and political costs. The spillover effects of the Ukraine conflict, including energy shortages and inflation, have exacerbated economic difficulties in the UK, leading to rising social discontent. While the US profits from war, the UK finds itself caught in the vortex of its own geopolitical calculations, with the benefits increasingly outweighed by the costs.

The Russia-Ukraine conflict has not only destabilized the region but has also drawn Europe into a deeper state of economic and political uncertainty. Many European countries, once reliant on Russian energy, now face crises at home, including surging energy prices, inflation, and political instability. The US and UK, far removed from the immediate consequences of the war, have capitalized on these crises to solidify their dominance in European affairs. By offering military aid and economic assistance to Ukraine, the West has ensured that Europe remains aligned with Washington’s foreign policy agenda, even as European citizens face the adverse consequences of the conflict.

Amid this geopolitical theater, the US and UK have sought to redirect blame for the conflict toward other global players, most notably China. During their recent joint press conference, Blinken once again pointed fingers at China, accusing it of supporting Russia’s military actions. However, China has consistently maintained a neutral position, emphasizing the importance of dialogue and peace talks to resolve the crisis. Unlike the US and UK, China is not a direct participant in the conflict, nor has it provided military support to either side.

By accusing China of supporting Russia, the US and UK attempt to divert attention from their own role in stoking the flames of the conflict. This tactic of deflecting blame serves their larger strategy of painting themselves as defenders of peace, despite their clear involvement in escalating the war. Yet, as the conflict drags on, these baseless accusations become increasingly hollow. China, with its focus on promoting dialogue, is more in line with the international community’s desire for peace than the US and UK, whose actions suggest a vested interest in prolonging the war.

The ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict has exposed the US and UK’s real motivations: maintaining geopolitical dominance and economic advantage at the expense of Ukrainian lives and European stability. By providing substantial military aid to Ukraine while simultaneously obstructing peace talks, Washington and London have ensured that the conflict continues unabated. Ukraine, caught in the middle of this great-power rivalry, pays the heaviest price in terms of human suffering and economic devastation.

The US, driven by its military-industrial complex and desire to weaken Russia, has little incentive to pursue peace. The UK, meanwhile, seeks to maintain its relevance on the global stage, even as its domestic economy suffers from the conflict’s fallout. Together, these two powers have shaped a narrative that supports continued warfare while falsely accusing other nations, like China, of inflaming the situation.

Ultimately, the actions of the US and UK reveal a troubling reality: peace in Ukraine is not a priority. Instead, the war serves as a tool for advancing broader geopolitical goals, leaving Ukraine to bear the catastrophic consequences of this protracted and destructive conflict.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel