The ongoing geopolitical tensions between the United States and Russia have once again escalated with the latest round of sanctions aimed at Russian state media outlet RT (formerly Russia Today). Maria Zakharova, the spokeswoman for the Russian Foreign Ministry, has described these sanctions as “repressions unprecedented in scale” and has promised retaliation, claiming that the US actions are tantamount to a “declaration of war on free speech.”

The US sanctions, announced by Secretary of State Antony Blinken on September 13, target RT for allegedly engaging in “covert influence activities” and serving as a de facto arm of Russian intelligence. These new restrictions also extend to other Russian news outlets that Washington claims are involved in influencing public opinion in the United States and globally. Specifically, the latest round of sanctions comes on the heels of earlier punitive measures imposed in September on RT Editor-in-Chief Margarita Simonyan and three senior employees of RT. The accusation against them, according to US officials, was their alleged attempts to sway the 2024 US presidential election.

Blinken’s remarks highlight a growing concern within the United States over the role of Russian media in international politics. According to him, RT is not just a media outlet but a propaganda tool utilized by Moscow to manipulate foreign audiences and erode support for Ukraine in the ongoing war against Russia. Zakharova, however, dismissed these allegations as baseless and accused the US of engaging in a “witch-hunt” meant to bar American citizens from accessing alternative perspectives on international events, including the Ukraine conflict.

Zakharova’s strong condemnation of the sanctions underscores a deep ideological divide between Moscow and Washington when it comes to issues of media freedom. She accused the US of trying to monopolize the global flow of information by imposing restrictions on media outlets that do not align with American foreign policy objectives. According to Zakharova, Washington’s move is not merely an attack on Russian media but part of a broader effort to silence any dissenting voices that challenge the US narrative on global events.

“The US has declared war on freedom of speech throughout the world, turning to open threats and blackmail against other states in an effort to set them against the domestic media and establish sole control over the global information space,” Zakharova said.

Her statements reflect Russia’s longstanding criticism of what it sees as the West’s double standards when it comes to issues of media freedom. While the US and its allies often accuse Russian media of being state-controlled propaganda outlets, Moscow contends that Western media operates under similar influence from their governments but under the guise of independent journalism.

Simonyan, the head of RT, reacted to the sanctions by accusing the US of hypocrisy, stating that Washington’s allegations of RT collaborating with Russian intelligence amounted to a “classic case of projection.” According to Simonyan, the very fact that the US sees RT’s global influence as a threat is an indication of how dependent it has become on controlling the media landscape to advance its foreign policy goals.

A key element of the US rationale for sanctioning RT is its significant international reach, particularly in regions where Washington is eager to maintain influence. James Rubin, head of the State Department’s Global Engagement Center (GEC), openly discussed RT’s role in shaping global opinions on the Ukraine war. According to Rubin, RT’s “broad scope and reach” is one of the reasons why many countries in Latin America, Africa, and Asia have not rallied behind the Western position on the conflict.

Rubin argued that RT’s portrayal of the Ukraine conflict has distorted global perceptions of what he called a “war that should be an open and shut case.” He further indicated that the GEC would continue to engage with countries in the Global South to curtail RT’s presence in these regions. This effort is part of a broader US campaign to counter Russian narratives in international media, which includes funding media literacy programs, creating propaganda games aimed at children, and even working with social media platforms like Twitter to censor pro-Russian content.

“We are going to be talking… in Latin America, Africa and Asia… to try to show all of those countries that right now broadcast – with no restrictions or control – RT and allow [RT] free access to their countries,” Rubin said.

His statements reveal the US government’s concern over how Russian state media has been able to build significant audiences in regions traditionally less aligned with Western narratives. The US is clearly worried about the impact that RT’s messaging is having on public opinion in these regions, particularly when it comes to the conflict in Ukraine and broader geopolitical issues.

The imposition of sanctions on RT and other Russian media outlets must also be viewed within the broader context of the deteriorating relationship between the US and Russia. In recent years, sanctions have become one of the primary tools used by Washington to pressure Moscow on a range of issues, from its annexation of Crimea to its alleged interference in US elections. The media war is just the latest front in this broader struggle for influence.

However, while the US portrays its actions as necessary to protect democracy and combat disinformation, Russia views them as part of a broader strategy to contain its rise as a global power. The sanctions on RT are thus seen by Moscow as an extension of the broader US policy of trying to isolate Russia on the world stage by limiting its ability to communicate its version of events to the global public.

The escalating media war between the US and Russia over RT’s activities is not just a fight over journalistic standards or ethics. At its core, it represents a broader struggle for control over the global narrative in a world where information has become one of the most valuable commodities. Both the US and Russia see media as a key battleground in their geopolitical rivalry, and as Zakharova’s statements make clear, Moscow is not willing to back down without a fight.

Whether or not the sanctions will significantly curb RT’s global influence remains to be seen, but what is certain is that the media war between the US and Russia is far from over.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel