Controversial reinstatement sparks corruption concerns in Padma Bridge Project

0
Padma Bridge, Government, Corruption

In a controversial decision, a government employee previously dismissed for his involvement in a fraudulent compensation scheme related to the Padma Bridge project has been reinstated to his position, albeit with a reduced salary grade. This move has sparked widespread criticism and raised serious questions about the commitment to combating corruption within government ranks.

Mainul Hasan, a former land surveyor in Madaripur, was found guilty of facilitating a scam that resulted in the government losing BDT 10.64 million. During his tenure at the Madaripur deputy commissioner’s office in 2020, Mainul was responsible for overseeing land acquisition for the Padma Bridge in Shibchar upazila. In this capacity, he granted compensation amounting to BDT 10.64 million to two individuals for supposedly using 3.37 acres of their land in Sujanagar mouza for the project. However, investigations revealed that the land in question never belonged to these individuals; it was, in fact, government land.

Following allegations against Mainul, a three-member investigation committee was formed, led by the deputy director of local government. The committee confirmed that Mainul issued the compensation cheques on September 9 and September 20, 2020, based on forged documents. A separate probe by the land ministry also substantiated these findings.

“Allegations of negligence in the misconduct of duties are found true,” the probe body concluded. Consequently, on November 8, 2022, the ministry issued a notification stating that Mainul would be forced into retirement due to his involvement in the corruption. The notification highlighted that such dishonest activities not only harm the interests of the government but also tarnish the image of the office. It noted that Mainul personally benefited from the scheme and demonstrated a lack of honesty, impartiality, responsibility, and efficiency in his work. His response to a show-cause letter was deemed unsatisfactory, leading to his forced retirement.

However, on March 11, 2023, Mainul appealed to the land ministry. Despite the initial findings and the committee’s conviction that Mainul failed to provide a satisfactory defense, the ministry reconsidered its decision. After an appeal hearing led by Land Ministry Secretary Khalilur Rahman, the forced retirement was deemed “excessive punishment.” On June 9, 2024, a new notification was issued, reducing Mainul’s punishment to a lower salary grade for five years.

This decision has baffled many senior government officials and sparked criticism from various quarters. An anonymous officer from the ministry expressed concern that the reduction in punishment does not set a good precedent for junior officers. It implies a tolerance for corruption and undermines efforts to maintain integrity within the government.

Transparency International Bangladesh Executive Director Iftekharuzzaman strongly condemned the decision. “Specific allegations against the accused employee [Mainul] were proven and undeniable. The ministry officials, including the secretary who protected this employee, are guilty of supporting corruption,” he stated.

The reinstatement of Mainul Hasan raises significant concerns about the government’s commitment to tackling corruption. Despite clear evidence of wrongdoing and personal gain from the fraudulent scheme, the decision to reinstate Mainul sends a troubling message about accountability and integrity in public office. It suggests a leniency towards corrupt practices that could embolden other officials to engage in similar misconduct, believing that the consequences will be minimal.

Moreover, this case highlights the challenges in ensuring consistent and fair enforcement of anti-corruption measures. The initial investigation and punishment appeared to be a step in the right direction, demonstrating a commitment to upholding ethical standards. However, the subsequent reduction in punishment undermines these efforts and raises questions about the influence of internal politics and favoritism in disciplinary actions.

The reinstatement of Mainul Hasan, despite his proven involvement in a fraudulent compensation scheme, is a troubling development in the context of the Padma Bridge project. It underscores the need for stronger and more consistent enforcement of anti-corruption measures within the government. To restore public trust and ensure accountability, it is crucial for the authorities to re-evaluate this decision and reaffirm their commitment to combating corruption at all levels. Without such steps, the fight against corruption will remain an uphill battle, and the integrity of public institutions will continue to be compromised.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here