Julian Assange’s release versus fragility of press freedom

Julian Assange, Assange, British prisons, Journalistic

Last week marked a pivotal yet unsettling chapter in the saga of Julian Assange. Released from Belmarsh prison, Assange boarded a flight to Saipan, a US-governed Pacific island, where he struck a deal with US authorities. By pleading guilty to the charges of illegally obtaining and publishing classified documents, Assange secured his freedom, having already served five years in British prisons. However, this conclusion, while liberating for Assange, casts a long shadow over the broader issues of journalistic freedom and the lengths to which governments will go to suppress inconvenient truths.

Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, has been a polarizing figure since the website’s inception in 2006. WikiLeaks aimed to be a global platform for politically sensitive leaked documents, and it quickly made headlines with its early revelations on corruption in Kenya, the Arab world, and China’s crackdown on Tibetan unrest. However, it was the release of the “Collateral Murder” video in April 2010 that truly catapulted Assange and WikiLeaks into global notoriety.

The video, shot from a US Apache helicopter, graphically depicted the killing of at least 11 civilians, including Reuters journalists Namir Noor-Eldeen and Saeed Chmagh, on a Baghdad street in 2007. Despite repeated freedom of information requests by Reuters, the US government had kept the footage under wraps. The video shows a group of men, including the journalists, walking across a street when they are fired upon by the helicopter crew who mistakenly believe them to be insurgents. As the dust settles, a van arrives to rescue the wounded, only to be fired upon again, resulting in more deaths and injuries, including two children.

This chilling footage, along with the subsequent publication of the “Iraqi War Logs” and “Afghan War Logs” by WikiLeaks, exposed numerous war crimes, instances of torture, and other atrocities. The releases demonstrated a blatant disregard for human life and a systemic effort to cover up these acts. Ethan McCord, a soldier involved in the incident depicted in “Collateral Murder,” and his comrade Josh Stieber later wrote an open letter acknowledging the wrongdoing and the regularity of such occurrences in US-led wars.

The revelations sparked global outrage and turned Assange into a marked man. For many, the real crime lay not in the documented torture, killings, or cover-ups, but in the act of exposing these dark truths. Assange’s relentless pursuit by US authorities highlighted the extremes to which a government would go to silence dissent and keep its actions shrouded in secrecy. High-profile figures like former Republican presidential hopeful Mike Huckabee even called for Assange’s execution, and in 2017, CIA Director Mike Pompeo reportedly explored ways to assassinate him.

Despite the severity of the charges against Assange, many of his actions were akin to standard journalistic practices. He was charged under the Espionage Act, not for spying for a foreign power, but for publishing classified material – a practice common among investigative journalists. As Jameel Jaffer, a free speech expert at Columbia University, noted in 2019, the charges against Assange relied heavily on activities that are integral to investigative journalism. This case, therefore, represents a direct attack on press freedom.

Assange’s predicament has underscored the inherent dangers faced by journalists worldwide. From Russia to Gaza, India to Ethiopia, being a journalist is increasingly perilous. The protection of press freedom is more crucial than ever, yet Assange’s case reveals its alarming fragility.

Adding to the complexity of Assange’s story are the allegations of rape and sexual assault brought against him in Sweden in 2012. Assange sought refuge in the Ecuadorian embassy in London, claiming the charges were a ploy by the US to facilitate his extradition. Regardless of the veracity of these claims, they should have been tested in court. Assange’s refusal to face these allegations contradicts his professed commitment to accountability and ethical conduct.

The Obama administration, while relentless in its pursuit of whistleblowers, refrained from prosecuting Assange. They recognized that prosecuting him for publishing information would set a dangerous precedent, jeopardizing press freedom. The subsequent Trump administration had no such reservations. In 2019, US prosecutors charged Assange with 17 counts of espionage and an additional charge of conspiracy to hack.

The messiness of Assange’s story is undeniable. Critics, including former allies within WikiLeaks and mainstream media partners, have accused him of failing to adequately protect the individuals exposed in the leaked documents. The lack of sufficient redaction, they argue, put lives at risk. Despite these valid criticisms, the core issue remains: Assange’s prosecution is an assault on the ability of journalists to expose uncomfortable truths and hold those in power accountable.

Assange’s forced plea deal and subsequent release underline the precarious state of press freedom. His case serves as a grim reminder of the lengths to which governments will go to maintain control over information. In an era where the role of the press is more critical than ever, defending journalistic freedom is not just important – it is essential. The Assange saga, with all its complexities and controversies, ultimately highlights the need for unwavering vigilance in protecting the rights of journalists to inform the public and expose wrongdoing.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here