Commercial benefits using religious and anti-Israel sentiment

Coca-Cola, Bangladesh, Palestinians

In a world where marketing strategies and political sentiments often intersect, the case of a local soft-drink maker in Bangladesh highlights a contentious yet powerful blend of commercial interests and religious sentiments. This soft-drink manufacturer has leveraged anti-Israel rhetoric to promote its products, resulting in a significant market shift. By branding Coca-Cola and other major international brands as “Israeli products,” the local company has not only increased its market share but also stirred up a storm of controversy and misinformation.

Bangladesh’s support for Palestinians is deeply rooted in both moral and religious convictions. The nation’s stance is a reflection of its collective abhorrence towards the illegal and starkly brutal actions of the Israeli government against Palestinians. The atrocities committed by Israel, including the mass killing of children and civilians, are unequivocally condemned by Bangladesh. Such acts are seen as a gross violation of human rights and dignity, and no civilized nation should tolerate them.

Furthermore, the Israeli strategy of utilizing starvation as a means to decimate the Palestinian population is perceived as an abhorrent act of cruelty that contravenes all principles of humanity and justice. Bangladesh’s unwavering support for Palestine is thus framed not only by political alignment but also by a profound ethical commitment to justice and the protection of innocent lives. The Prime Minister, Sheikh Hasina is very much vocal on this particular issue in global stage.

The anti-Israel campaign spearheaded by the local soft-drink maker is a clear example of commercial propaganda. By framing major international brands such as Coca-Cola, Sprite, Fanta, Pepsi, 7Up, and Mirinda as products from Israel, the company has tapped into existing political and religious sentiments to drive its own sales. This propaganda has proven effective, with a notable decline in the sales of these international brands and a corresponding rise in the popularity of the local brand, Mojo. The campaign has not only capitalized on the emotional and political affiliations of the consumers but has also overshadowed the facts about these international brands, which have no direct connections to Israel.

Coca-Cola, a global beverage giant, operates in over 190 countries and has been a symbol of globalization and consumer culture for 138 years. The company’s operations are decentralized, meaning that its products are manufactured, bottled, and distributed locally in many regions, including Bangladesh. Despite this, the local anti-Israel campaign has successfully propagated the myth that Coca-Cola is an “Israeli product,” leading to a significant decline in sales. It is important to note that Coca-Cola sold its Bangladeshi bottling operations to a Turkish associate, Coca-Cola Icecek, earlier this year, a move the company asserts was unrelated to the current decline in sales.

The use of religious and political sentiments for commercial gain is not a new phenomenon. Historical events provide several examples where economic interests have been masked by or intertwined with religious sentiments. One such example is the Sepoy Revolt of 1757, where the East India Company’s insensitivity to religious practices played a significant role in igniting the rebellion. During 90s, the case of Keya Halal Soup in Bangladesh highlights how products can be marketed by aligning them with religious sentiments, ensuring a loyal consumer base. More recently, the Coca-Cola issue is similar to previous issues.

The exploitation of the Palestinian cause for commercial gain is both morally and politically questionable. While the local soft-drink maker claims to donate a portion of its profits to Palestinians in Gaza, this act of charity is overshadowed by the larger context of misinformation and commercial gain. True support for Palestine should be rooted in genuine humanitarian efforts and political advocacy, rather than being used as a marketing tool to discredit competitors and manipulate consumer sentiments.

The situation in Bangladesh serves as a stark reminder of the potent mix of commercial interests and religious sentiments. The local soft-drink maker’s campaign against Coca-Cola and other international brands is a clear case of commercial propaganda that exploits political and religious emotions. While the campaign has proven commercially successful, it is built on a foundation of misinformation and political rhetoric. It is crucial for consumers to be aware of the actual facts and not be swayed by manipulative marketing tactics. Ultimately, true support for any cause, including the Palestinian cause, should be based on genuine efforts and ethical practices, not on commercial exploitation.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here