Historical legacies in Turkey’s evolving political landscape


Following the March municipal elections in Turkey, wherein President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s Justice and Development Party (AKP) fell short of securing a majority in major metropolitan municipalities, a discernible easing of political tensions has emerged. This transition heralds a prospect of a more harmonious political climate in Turkey, a development awaited with anticipation by numerous observers. The outcome suggests a potential recalibration of power dynamics and a renewed emphasis on cooperation among political factions, promising a period of relative tranquility in Turkish politics.

A notable sign of this thaw is exemplified by the recent diplomatic gesture made by Ozgur Ozel, leader of the main opposition Republican People’s Party (CHP), who paid a courtesy visit to President Erdogan. This act of goodwill, met with Erdogan’s commitment to reciprocate the visit, highlights an increasingly evident trend towards constructive dialogue among Turkey’s diverse political factions. Erdogan’s recognition of the imperative for this shift was explicitly articulated when he stated, “Turkey’s political life needs this.” Such statements underscore a growing consensus among political leaders regarding the necessity of fostering cooperation and mutual understanding for the greater benefit of Turkish society.

Erdogan’s embrace of a former adversary such as Ozel signals a departure from the confrontational politics that have characterized Turkish governance in the past. Erdogan’s previous dominance often quelled opportunities for reconciliation. Yet, the recent electoral outcome appears to have acted as a catalyst for change, compelling a reevaluation of entrenched political strategies. This shift underscores a growing recognition of the need for inclusivity and cooperation in Turkey’s political landscape.

Additionally, Ozel’s diplomatic efforts transcend the confines of the AKP, as demonstrated by his conciliatory visit to the leader of the AKP’s informal ally, the far-right Nationalist Movement Party (MHP). Erdogan’s consistent dialogue with MHP leader Devlet Bahceli, conducted largely as a matter of protocol, illuminates the nuanced intricacies inherent in coalition formation within the Turkish political landscape.

A significant resurgence of historical political protocols is apparent in Erdogan’s directive to key ministers to provide briefing sessions prior to foreign visits. These procedural guidelines, reminiscent of pre-Erdogan administrations, indicate a resurgence of institutionalized decision-making mechanisms within the AKP. This shift reflects a renewed commitment to structured governance and underscores Erdogan’s efforts to restore stability and coherence to Turkey’s diplomatic engagements.

However, Erdogan’s persistence in upholding certain entrenched practices, such as the recent prohibition of May Day demonstrations, underscores the persistent hurdles on Turkey’s journey towards political normalization. The specter of historical tragedies, such as the 1977 May 1 incident, looms large, shaping contemporary policy decisions. This delicate equilibrium between security imperatives and democratic liberties underscores the complexity of navigating Turkey’s evolving political landscape.

Moving forward, Erdogan confronts the daunting challenge of securing backing from the Kurdish Democratic Society Party (DEM) in the looming 2028 elections. Despite preliminary engagements, Kurdish political factions remain cautious due to historical grievances and unmet commitments from mainstream political forces. Establishing trust with the Kurdish constituency holds paramount importance for Erdogan’s political ambitions, necessitating a concerted effort to address longstanding grievances and foster genuine rapport with Kurdish voters.

The evolving landscape of Turkish society further complicates Erdogan’s political calculus. A noticeable decline in the proportion of youth identifying as conservatives over the past decade raises questions about the AKP’s long-term viability. The emergence of alternative ideological orientations, such as “deism,” underscores the shifting dynamics within Turkish society and poses challenges for traditional conservative parties like the AKP.

Central to Erdogan’s agenda is the pursuit of a constitutional amendment, necessitating broader political consensus. With the AKP lacking the requisite parliamentary majority, Erdogan faces an uphill battle in achieving his objectives. Attempts to sway opposition factions, like the CHP, or to forge new alliances within parliament underscore Erdogan’s strategic maneuvering in pursuit of his goals.

The establishment of the “table of six” alliance among opposition factions ahead of the 2023 general election underscores the dynamic nature of Turkish politics. Although certain smaller parties have shifted alliances to align with the AKP post-election, Erdogan’s attempts to engage with the Kurdish DEM Party are viewed with caution due to enduring historical grievances. This skepticism underscores the intricate and delicate interplay of political alliances and historical legacies in Turkey’s evolving political landscape.

Turkey’s internal political terrain is undergoing a significant realignment, marked by a cautious reduction in rivalries and a reaffirmation of institutional standards. Erdogan’s pursuit of unity and constitutional reform underscores the intricate dynamics of Turkish politics, where entrenched historical narratives intersect with evolving societal trends and contemporary governance imperatives. As Erdogan grapples with these multifaceted challenges, the future trajectory of Turkish politics remains uncertain, characterized by a fluid and dynamic landscape ripe with potential shifts and transformations.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here